Search:

I never said it was more acceptable to do anything, I was just debating the fact that you can logic for/against God.

The logical steps for consciousness probably wouldn't apply to something that was eternal and omnipotent. If a being always was omnipotent always existed then it wouldn't follow those rules, but be...

I couldn't possibly explain anything about God, which is my point. I am not suggesting that God is anything. I'm just saying that saying God is anything is assumption so regarding God you can't say...

Of course non-existence doesn't exist.

I'm saying that a supreme being doesn't exist to your understanding of existence. Therefore trying to say that existence as we know it has to be a certain...

Nobody said anything about proving the existence of anything, I said you couldn't prove or disprove it. edit: ironic I was being the devil's advocate talking about God.

You can't prove or disprove...

I'm saying you can't prove or disprove that existence was created by a supreme being. Existence as we know it doesn't have to follow your logic. Being that a supreme being is supernatural you can't...

The whole point about time and God was to say that you can't say that he waited around a long time to do anything. The facts about when life appeared are irrelevant to any argument for or against...

You could always say God's perception of time is different.

The age of the earth and the known universe would be hard to explain to a primitive human; the "six days" in Genesis would be easy for a...