That is sexist.
Type: Posts; User: Guisslapp; Keyword(s):
That is sexist.
He said he would support a study.
We finally agree.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/01/how-russia-helped-to-swing-the-election-for-trump
That is where you get the false info in the first place. That and State TV.
You omitted perhaps the two biggest parts of the story:
1. The meeting at Trump Tower over the planned quid pro quo.
2. The Trump campaign supplying internal polling data to the Russians to...
So far it has only been shown that the Trump campaign had the criminals.
My mind hasn’t changed. What are you talking about?
Loads of smoke around contacts with Russia and Trump campaign, particularly around Wikileaks and polling data. And then all the lies by all of the Trump campaign folks when asked about the Russian...
And it has only become more clear that their was sufficient evidence to justify an investigation.
The StateTV News network doesn’t really provide support for that crazy headline.
I don’t loathe rich people’s success. Why do you need to believe that rich people are, on average, better than poor people?
I am not inserting judgment of people’s quality at all into this...
No - that is what I have said from the beginning. Some of you have tried to twist it, but I have stayed on this point in this debate. It is really not a debatable point.
How many of these people do you think had the knowledge that capital is valued more than labor in our economy? And where might have gained this particular kernel of financial knowledge, let alone...
Nevertheless, my point stands and you helped me make it. Thanks. Capital is worth more than labor in our economy. It is okay to admit it. The truth will set you free.
Most of the links I clicked of yours are articles that, in discussing income inequality or the growing rich poor gap, cite one of the economists who have focused on the same economic data recognizing...
Then it should be easy for you to find a quote of that.
What liberal have you head say that the market values capital over labor?
Liberals don’t say what I am saying. I am not a socialist. I am more capitalist than you.
You are basically making my case for me. Why are they poor if they are working hard if capitalism rewards hard work?
Work smarter, not harder.
It doesn’t surprise me that you think learning facts is pointless.
Why would I?
How you define “rich” is not relevant to what I am talking about. I am talking about the fact that in the US, Capital is valued and rewarded more than hard work. That is undebatably true.
Not...
Nice slogan, but it isn’t factual. It isn’t the way our economy works. There is no requirement of hard work and hard work doesn’t necessarily create market value.