Do they qualify as a band though? If so, maybe the Mouseketeers deserve mention as well. :icon_wink:
|
|
|
|
|
Type: Posts; User: randerizer; Keyword(s):
Do they qualify as a band though? If so, maybe the Mouseketeers deserve mention as well. :icon_wink:
Nada Surf
Everclear
Must admit, I haven't heard a full J.E.W. album. The fact that they have Butch Vig working on production for them probably helps. They sound a little like Coheed and Cambria to me, and that is a...
Sure, but it seems obvious to me that Christians (that listen to "Christian" bands) have lower standards (in terms of quality of the music) and possibly higher standards (in terms of the "moral"...
I didn't really say it would decrease in value -- just that I'd be more likely to label it as "crappy." It's more likely to leave a lasting impression of its "crappiness" than a band that I've never...
Interesting question. The fat chicks like Hootie, though, right? That's sort of a deal-breaker. :laugh:
I found their Smash album to be pretty good (Bad Habit, Self Esteem, Come out and Play). The others were far to cheesy for my taste. But even Smash does sound a little like a wannabe-Nirvana, so I...
I thought the Hansen (sp?) one was a pretty good example as well.
Chumbawumba
Crash Test Dummies
OMC
Harvey Danger
I wouldn't call it an anti-popularity list, although I would certainly say that a band that is very popular but very average (forgettable) deserves to go on it moreso than a band that is less popular...
Nothing stands out as worth liking. Average, forgettable band.
Popular never defines what I consider good or awful. Although, a song that sucks AND is way overplayed (because it is popular I suppose) makes it that much more grating.
I don't have a problem...
Creed
Seven Mary Three
Eve 6
Hootie and the Blowfish was AWFUL.