The reason that some would be concerned about that is the possibility of the Big-leftovers taking 5 teams from CUSA that don't include Tech. In that scenario we're in the Sun Belt by default. But...
|
|
|
|
|
Type: Posts; User: inudesu; Keyword(s):
The reason that some would be concerned about that is the possibility of the Big-leftovers taking 5 teams from CUSA that don't include Tech. In that scenario we're in the Sun Belt by default. But...
Sure they would. That's the base of the previous CUSA.
You think Tech, USM, Tulsa, or any other current CUSA wouldn't rather join those schools than the other current CUSA schools? Especially if...
While those teams are all in CUSA right now, I'm not sure I'd lose any sleep over any of them leaving. We have too many teams right now anyway.
The idea is that even without Boise and SDSU, the current "Big" East would always be able to pull whomever they like from CUSA.
That would be bad for us if they took Tulsa and USM (because of...
Understood. But it's not like either conference can tell the less desirable schools to take a hike not that they've got them. That's why it'd never happen.
But all the Tech to SB mess overlooked...
It's decided. Lot of details to hash out.
As a fan of a CUSA school - I hope the remaining BE falls apart.
...
The best solution (from where I sit, which is obviously at odds with what a lot of the individual players would want) is to let the Catholic schools go and keep the Big East auto-bid and name. Then...
Back when the MWC schools split off, the simple solution was to add an auto-bid and stay at 64 games. Instead they added the play-in game.
The tournament hates auto-bids. Even with several play-in...