This is, as I'm sure you understand, a pointless debate. You believe that those two theories have been "proven" with the current hard data, and I do not. I still hold them to be theories, with some...
|
|
|
|
|
Type: Posts; User: dawg80; Keyword(s):
This is, as I'm sure you understand, a pointless debate. You believe that those two theories have been "proven" with the current hard data, and I do not. I still hold them to be theories, with some...
No, it is not.
It is very much like GW.
Overwhelming evidence?????????? OMG!
I understand archeologists have uncovered 1/4 mile strip of road in Kansas. I believe that proves my theory that there was a road, eons ago!, that ran from...
Surprised I have to explain this to you. But, okay... point is people accept theories like evolution, global warming. etc... based on what scientists tell them. Some quack passing himself off as an...
For those of you that blindly accept science, er, religiously, here's some food for thought:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070715/sc_nm/zanzibar_fish_dc;_ylt=AqCVuONah53N3ME4RtlwS557hMgF
It's...
Wow! this thread has exploded. Must be so easy to comment on evolution, a caveman can do it.
...and some have. :icon_wink:
No, atheists MUST be the ones to explain on scientific opinion alone. If God does not exist and there is a purely scientific explanation to account for the origin of everything, including man, let's...
Wrong again. I am a Christian by belief and a scientist by training and practice. I don't reject evolution as being factual from a religious point of view (although I could(would)), I reject...