One of the problems we had in Afghanistan is that the people won’t stand for any principle other than what makes them money. China merely needs to bribe (or debt financing) the local leaders to get...
Type: Posts; User: Guisslapp; Keyword(s):
One of the problems we had in Afghanistan is that the people won’t stand for any principle other than what makes them money. China merely needs to bribe (or debt financing) the local leaders to get...
You don’t think China will want Afghanistan’s lithium and rare earths rather than allow a new competitor?
Just every corporation that is willing to put its IP at risk for a chance to sell into their market.
You must have fancier stuff than the stuff that is made in Vietnam, Thaliand, Malaysia, India and Indonesia. That is where labor is cheapest. China is no longer cheapest.
But cheaper labor is not...
People don’t go to China for labor so much anymore. They go to SE Asia. People go to China for their growing market, which pretty much means you have to manufacture in country…and all the rest that...
Anything more definitive risks threatening Chinese sovereignty and the end to what peace they have been experiencing.
Exactly, ambiguity is the point. So far, the policy has allowed for Taiwan’s peaceful coexistence and de facto independence.
For decades the US has maintained a policy known as “strategic ambiguity” with regard to Taiwan - look at the 1979 Taiwan Relations Act to understand.
They have close to 1.5 billion people living there.
Are you familiar with the fable of the boy that cried “Wolf?”
That is, in essence, one of the problems with having an administration like the last one that found no conspiracy theory too far...
Ironic
Ironic
I am not taking the Chinese or WHO’s word for anything.
No, it is the same Zingli-Li Shi from Wuhan. Click on the Nature article and look at the full list of authors.
That connection has long since been debunked.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.newsobserver.com/news/local/article241996426.html
https://www.modernhealthcare.com/safety-quality/coronavirus-evolution-bats-may-have-resulted-highly-efficient-human-pathogen
Your logic doesn’t make sense. When would they have had this naturally occurring, not lab made virus to experiment on people? The problem with your theory is that (1) you wouldn’t know whether it...
What do you mean “knew they had something”? That they created something? How else would they have something?
The researcher conspiracy theory is the one that has been debunked because of the...
Think about it. Offer a single theory as to how one would go about weaponizing COVID without creating it in a lab. By the time you discover COVID and recognize its destructive potential it has...
The bottom line is that the genetics of the virus do not point to it being man made.
You are funny.
Sure, the genetics point to its evolution, rather than the lab creation of the virus. Given its high transmissibility after making the leap to humans, it is pretty crazy to think the Chinese could...
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41591-020-0820-9
What are you smoking? This has already been debunked. I don’t need to say something every time you try to revive some conspiracy theory that has already been debunked.
Who is “they”? She was acting as a representative on behalf of CAP at that time (2015). She couldn’t allow or stop anything.
That article you posted is entirely misleading.