.....oh, that's not good. I think obummer should be denied a 2nd term. What say thee!?
![]() |
![]() |
Type: Posts; User: dawg80; Keyword(s):
.....oh, that's not good. I think obummer should be denied a 2nd term. What say thee!?
Is this not a "regressive" act? I mean, is it not true that the majority of those 40mm are the "working poor?" Yet, obummercare wants to mandate they buy insurance. How about they be left to allocate...
The pro-obummercare mandate argument comes down to this: there are 40 million Americans who presently do not have health insurance. Of course, that means that 300+ million do. That begs the obvious...
The best counter argument made, by one of the Justices, is the example of burial insurance. Bingo! nailed it.