Won't speak for the Republicans, since I am not one, and you certainly aren't either...Mr. Commie Comrade...but I will speak for myself. Bam! Right there is why you and all other wackos have ZERO credibility on this issue (and you have negative credibility overall). You think, pretend, the matter (the science) has been settled and either you accept the bullshit about man-made "climate change" OR!!!!!! you are in denial. I reject the premise.
Of course, I could flip the argument and state that either you accept the real science that climate change happens naturally, and has been happening forever, OR!!! you are a denier of this truth. So, you wackos have abandoned your seat at the table of this debate by making the debate about denialism.
There is NO DEBATE...climate change has been occurring for eons, waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay before man started using fossil fuels. Go ahead...deny that.
If you take someone like Bill Gates as an example, he doesn’t say we should stop using fossil fuels right now. That is a fringe group of activists. The serious activists believe in pushing the renewable shift faster than what would happen without intervention. They believe that the harms of global warming are not internalized in the cost of fossil fuels. It is an externality that society pays for regardless of who does the emitting. Buying an offset is one way of internalizing your costs if you maintain a carbon neutral footprint.
I'm still waiting to see Goosey's credentials that makes him an expert on the real science of climatology.
In the meantime he'll hunker down with the other libtard elitists and pretend they can buy "offsets" so they can continue to burn FF 100's of times faster than the average Joe.
No need to duck the question, it won’t bother me if you are “better educated” in science than I am. That science degree you hold from MIT trumps what I have, I’m sure. Lay it all out here. We give you permission to brag on yourself and won’t think you are anymore narcissistic than we already do.