Way to change the topic off Obama and Hillary's failure to protect Americans and American soil from radical Muslim terrorist.
But here goes with more proof of how far NASA is in the tank with Obama and the looney libs. Remember that NASA's main goal and duty is to promote Obama's global warming agenda.
This made huge news a year ago as posted on BB&B.
http://www.latechbbb.com/forum/showthread.php?100701-Dangerous-Global-Cooling-III&p=1533341#post1533341
Exactly! Just more BS from the libs/Obama/Hillary/Gore. Even the Washington Times understands the hypocrisy and total BS of the left.
PAPER: NOAA NASA deceptive temp record claims...
Deceptive temperature record claims
Warmest month announcements have no scientific basis
The U.S. government is at it again, hyping meaningless records in a parameter that does not exist in order to frighten us about something that doesn’t matter.
NASA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) announced this week that according to their calculations, July 2015 was the hottest month since instrumental records began in 1880. NOAA says that the record was set by eight one-hundredths of a degree Celsius over that set in July 1998. NASA calculates that July 2015 beat what they assert was the previous warmest month (July 2011) by two one-hundredths of a degree.
So, the new temperature records are meaningless. Neither agency knows whether a record was set.
Such misrepresentations are now commonplace in NOAA and NASAannouncements. They are regularly proclaiming monthly and yearly records set by less than the uncertainties in the measurements. Scientists within the agencies know that this is dishonest.
They also know that calculating so-called global average temperatures to hundredths of a degree is irrational. After all, there is very little data for the 70 percent of Earth’s surface that is ocean. There is also little data for mountainous and desert regions, not to mention the Antarctic. Much of the coverage is so sparse that NASA is forced to make the ridiculous claim that regions are adequately covered if there is a temperature-sensing station within nearly 750 miles. This is the distance between Ottawa, Canada, and Myrtle Beach, S.C. cities with very different climates. Yet, according to NASA, only one temperature sensing station is necessary for the two cities and the vast area between them to be adequately represented in their network.
More
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...emperature-re/
http://www.latechbbb.com/forum/showt...41#post1533341