In the Shreveport Times:
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/article/20120216/NEWS0402/202160320/Study-recommending-merger-LSUS-Tech-released-today?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPA
Another presentation tomorrow in Ruston at Tech.
|
|
|
|
|
In the Shreveport Times:
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/article/20120216/NEWS0402/202160320/Study-recommending-merger-LSUS-Tech-released-today?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPA
Another presentation tomorrow in Ruston at Tech.
I hope LSUS turns into "Louisiana Tech - Shreveport Campus".
Tech to LSU System, then LSUS merges with Tech to create Shreveport Campus; have access and research in LSUHSCOriginally Posted by qng001
Do you think Tech will go to the LSU System?
Of course depends on the circumstances, but Reneau has outlined conditions for that to happen and if those are met then yes I could easily see Tech to the LSU System. And if at the same time we join we decrease the costs of operating LSUS by taking over admin it makes it a little sweeter for the system. I know many people have misgivings and think, to quote Admiral Ackbar, "IT'S A TRAP!", but I think it would end up in Tech being better insulated from the massive budget cuts of recent history. Also, I think it would help ensure we get what we have earned from the funding formula, instead of portions of our increased funding siphoned off to dead-weights in the system (ULM & Grambling I'm looking at you), like it has in the past.
Link to Shreveport Time reproduction of text of final report and alternatives.
http://www.shreveporttimes.com/article/20120216/NEWS0402/120216014/Read-study-recommending-merger-LSUS-Tech?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE
That is a long read.
In Baton Rouge paper today too:
http://theadvocate.com/home/2083816-...-tech-and.html
Reason given for staying in the UL systemRecommendation #1: ConsolidationConsolidate LSU in Shreveport and Louisiana Tech University as a single, enlarged “new” Louisiana Tech in the UL System—a single university with a Ruston Campus and a Shreveport Campus
Discussion: The combined single institution would continue to be a Regents-designated statewide university, operating in two campuses of equal importance—rather than “main campus” in Ruston and “branch” campus in Shreveport. Its Role/Scope/Mission would be that presently assigned to Louisiana Tech. Some programs already taught at the Ruston Campus would be offered or expanded at the Shreveport Campus. Some new programs would be established for delivery at the Shreveport Campus. Students completing requirements would receive Louisiana Tech University diplomas—irrespective of which campus—Ruston or Shreveport—they attended.
Here's the direct link to the pdf'sn such a hypothetical scenario for LSU and UL, a consolidated, enlarged Louisiana Tech would seem to fit most logically in the LSU System. Also, some informal inputs at the time suggested possible openness on the part of both Louisiana Tech and LSU to considering such transfer, no doubt inspired, at least in part, by the appeal and logic of revamping LSU as a “flagship and research university system.”
Later, EKA became aware that there are some versions of possible reorganization under discussion in which LSU no longer would be a system of institutions but, rather, a single institution—“One LSU.” In that version of the future, were it to come about, there would be no place for Louisiana Tech.
Entire Study: http://www.shreveporttimes.com/asset...9185197216.PDF
Alternatives Evaluation & Recommendations: http://www.shreveporttimes.com/assets/pdf/D9185198216.PDF
Page 118 look who's missing from interviewees....
DR?
Also found this:
And later on a sub-recommendation specifically states that a MOU from Reneau to not retire until certain early stage transition's are done; sounds like some on the board may get their wish that Reneau move on to greener pastures...Dr. Dan Reneau’s longstanding personal and professional relationships with the Shreveport-Bossier community have earned him a high degree of personal credibility and trust there. Thus, his personal role in the early stages of implementing a consolidation is critical....With both Dr. Reneau and Dr. Marsala nearing retirement, if a consolidation is to be, an arrangement that secures their involvement and leadership in early implementation is needed.
Last edited by GermDawg; 02-16-2012 at 01:30 PM.
I don't think we should merge if we are staying in ULS. That just drags us down....
I agree...
Isn't this the 8th times this has been discussed?? Not by the board exactly, but by "them".
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
