I assume that the canoe build is top notch, we might need more athletic engineers to paddle next year (that'll be hard to find).
I assume that the canoe build is top notch, we might need more athletic engineers to paddle next year (that'll be hard to find).
What happened? We OWN that competition.
I don't think that's the main problem. The races are only 25% of the score.
Max points per category
25 - Design Paper
25 - Oral Presentation
25 - Overall Product
25 - Races
I don't know, but my guess is that it looks like we lack the man hours that these other schools have. Their teams look like they have a lot more members than our team, which makes sense because most of those schools are significantly larger than Tech.
Also, where do we practice? Lake D'Arbonne?
so, 06, would you say that once again, we are doing more with less??
Last edited by Dawg06; 06-19-2012 at 12:38 AM.
In the oral presentation category, we've finished last twice and second to last twice. They may be discriminating against our accents.
Year 1998
2008
2010
2011
2012
Design Paper 8 19 22 12 21 Oral Presentation 21 15 21 22 22 Final Product 16 21 17 12 17 Display 14 N/A N/A N/A N/A Women's Sprints see note DNQ DNQ DNQ DNQ Men's Sprints see note DNQ DNQ DNQ DNQ Coed Sprints see note DNQ DNQ DNQ DNQ Women's Slalom/Endurance Race see note 17 16 20 17 Men's Slalom/Endurance Race see note 14 17 19 18 Overall
14th of 21 21st of 22 22nd of 22 17th of 23 21st of 22
Notes
In 1998, Tech finished 13th overall for all the races averaged together.
To qualify for the sprint finals, you have to be in the top 10.
Display was only judged in 1998.
Last edited by Dawg06; 06-19-2012 at 12:46 AM.