CNN Ratings Hit 20-Year Low...

[Guisslapp]

Fake news site. Totally biased.

They provide links (like Wikipedia) if you question their account. But it might require you to step outside your echo chamber.

[JuBru]

They provide links (like Wikipedia) if you question their account. But it might require you to step outside your echo chamber.

I think the problem is the whole piece can be summed up as this : ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . They don't push the arrow one way or the other.

[Guisslapp]

But speaking of "proven" lies, who remembers this whopper

"Our government has a firm policy not to capitulate to terrorist demands. That no-concessions policy remains in force, despite the wildly speculative and false stories about arms for hostages and alleged ransom payments, we did not, repeat, did not trade weapons or anything else for hostages, nor will we..."

Anyone? I know some folks might be too young too remember this, but some of our seasoned veterans surely do. Who professed this well proven lie?

[Guisslapp]

I think the problem is the whole piece can be summed up as this : ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . They don't push the arrow one way or the other.

I know. It just goes to show the difficulty in proven Hillary lied. Some people believe it because is conforms to their pre-established view on Hillary. Others just can't really make anything definitive out of it.

[dawg80]

No I'm not. That was documented in the House investigation. She lied at least five times knowing the video was not the cause of the attacks.

Yep! the whole obummer administration went into defense mode and created the lie about the video and its cause of the attack on Benghazi. That has been proven false from numerous sources. The British warned us, our stupid "leaders" of the time, obummer and Killary, that an attack was imminent in Libya, and that Benghazi was an easy target. The British recalled their own personnel and evacuated their facility in Benghazi and urged the US to do the same.

Susan Rice, in particular, was sent out to spread the lie about the video. But both obummer and Killary also made statements that the video was the cause of the "spontaneous" attack on the US embassy in Benghazi.

The lamestream media gladly signed on to that lie as obummer was in his re-election bid and the libtards didn't want any negative news to get out.

FOX News, at first, reported the story of the video as that was the official explanation of our government. In the early hours after the attack, all FOX could do was report the information coming to them. But, being real journalists, not the puppets of lamestream media, FOX began asking questions and digging into the story. Within a day or so, FOX had the intelligence officer from the Britain "state department" on the air. He could not disclose everything he knew, but he did confirm a message had been sent to US Intelligence and the US State Department warning of an attack. The story developed as more information came out. Through it all, the lamestream media kept up the great cover-up and morons like Gooselap lapped it up like the ignorant slugs they are.

But, don't be too hard on him. He's just an ape still learning to peel a banana with his feet so he can swing from trees at the same time.

[dawg80]

I think the problem is the whole piece can be summed up as this : ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ . They don't push the arrow one way or the other.

Of course....still defending obummer and Killary. tch, tch.

[JuBru]

Of course....still defending obummer and Killary. tch, tch.

How you can possibly make that determination is beyond all reason. Same with how you continue to lie and believe a false idea as if you're a democrat.

[Guisslapp]

The incompetence around Benghazi is multifaceted and HRC owns at least apart of it. Dawg80 sets new standards for incompetence daily, so Benghazi starts to look a little bit better each passing day. I feel like I am watching "Idiocracy" reading his posts.

[Soonerdawg]

unlike CNN

CNN in unabashedly biased. Once again, I don't think it is a bad thing. CNN is a business and they can do with their money as they wish. CNN targets liberals. Fox is a business too, and they are unabashedly biased. Historically the media in the United States has never been unbiased either. The press during the Thomas Jefferson years openly took sides often with so-called fake news.

Your inability to see that CNN is biased for the Democratic Party destroys your credibility, and thus makes me believe perhaps there is a God.

[Guisslapp]

CNN in unabashedly biased. Once again, I don't think it is a bad thing. CNN is a business and they can do with their money as they wish. CNN targets liberals. Fox is a business too, and they are unabashedly biased. Historically the media in the United States has never been unbiased either. The press during the Thomas Jefferson years openly took sides often with so-called fake news.

Your inability to see that CNN is biased for the Democratic Party destroys your credibility, and thus makes me believe perhaps there is a God.

They uphold higher journalistic standards than Womanizer News, though not as high as in many print media (which is not surprising). FN and MSNBC are on opposite sides of the spectrum. The bias of CNN is mild by comparison to the other two. CNN won't run with a story unless they feel they have credible enough sources. FN will go with anything and provide extreme reporting of what "may" have happened.

[Guisslapp]

But speaking of "proven" lies, who remembers this whopper

"Our government has a firm policy not to capitulate to terrorist demands. That no-concessions policy remains in force, despite the wildly speculative and false stories about arms for hostages and alleged ransom payments, we did not, repeat, did not trade weapons or anything else for hostages, nor will we..."

I can't believe no one remembers this one!

[Soonerdawg]

They uphold higher journalistic standards than Womanizer News, though not as high as in many print media (which is not surprising). FN and MSNBC are on opposite sides of the spectrum. The bias of CNN is mild by comparison to the other two. CNN won't run with a story unless they feel they have credible enough sources. FN will go with anything and provide extreme reporting of what "may" have happened.

If you perceive CNN as upholding some sort of journalistic standards, you are a far leftist. You are pulling for a team and any call that is against you is a bad call.

Besides, "journalist standards" is an oxymoron. It doesn't bother me that it is either. The press is what it is; i.e., a business trying to make money.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Because the lies were only alleged.

OMGoodness!

[Guisslapp]

But speaking of "proven" lies, who remembers this whopper

"Our government has a firm policy not to capitulate to terrorist demands. That no-concessions policy remains in force, despite the wildly speculative and false stories about arms for hostages and alleged ransom payments, we did not, repeat, did not trade weapons or anything else for hostages, nor will we..."

Comeon, guys! We hate lying politicians, right? Why not call this liar out? Name that liar. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Comeon, guys! We hate lying politicians, right? Why not call this liar out? Name that liar. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.

Obama, Hillary, Rice, Pelosi......and on and on....