|
|
Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
CNN and MSNBC have had so many plus their big ones vs. Fox New's 2 biggies.
It's not even close.
But the real reason for CNN and MSNBC is their poor service/product and ratings.
Ie...business and $$$ reasons.
I guess FoxNews viewers don’t have standards.
No it's the CNN and MSNBC viewers, especially the moderate Dems and the independents, which have CNN and MSNBC. They are now seeking other news venues that will at least report a glimmer of the truth and not as much hatred and promotion of subtle pro-violence stances.
While not directly related to CNN, it is related to google and thier attempt at manipulating people. To prove that they are in bed with Democrats I will submit
example A: Up until yesterday you could google "Clinton and Epstein" and find a dozen or so images of them together socializing. Now if you do that, you only see pictures of Clinton and Epstein side by side, but obviously separate pictures and not shown "together" at the same event as in the past. However if you do google Clinton and Epstein, they do show pictures of Trump and Epstein together in the same picture. Definite manipulation going on here.
Exhibit B: NBC News:
As everyone knows by now, earlier today a reporter (I use the word loosely) asked Mitch McConnell if he was aware that two of his great-great-grandfathers were slave owners in Alabama before the Civil War.
McConnell had a great quip ready, knowing in advance that the MSM was going to try to attack him on this revelation. So McConnell replies, "I find myself once again in the same position as President Obama. We both oppose reparations and we both are the descendants of slave owners"
That's some O.G. stuff right there. Witty. Succinct. And 100% true.
So how does NBC report on this tonight? Behold:quote:
WASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., on Tuesday confirmed that he is a descendant of slave owners and reiterated that he still opposes government reparations for descendants of American slaves.
Complete and utter bias in reporting.
Why were you googling “Clinton and Epstein”?
Looking for confirmation bias? But instead just discovered how much Trump liked him. Lol
If you try Bing and Yahoo and other search engines, you get similar results, so your Google conspiracy theory doesn’t really hold water.
Because it is well known that Clinton and Epstein were big buds.. He made several trips with Epstein on his private jet. A couple of trips were sans Secret Service Detail. Epstein was a big democrat donor and had relationships with many powerful people in Washington. Early attempts by media tried to tie Trump and Epstein as big buds.. but that was not able to stick.
Google has a corporate culture that pushes democratic agenda and writes algorithms which limit which conservative results appear in search results. There have been undercover videos where google execs admit to this and state that they will do everything in their power to prevent ever having another person like Trump to occupy the white house. But I'm sure you would call videos of C-execs of google admitting to this as fake news..
That was a doctored video, but nice try.
Google is a great company. I tried searching all other major search engine and couldn’t find the treasure trove of pictures you claimed to have seen.
It is pretty good then that the Internet threw a bucket of cold water on your effort to find confirmation of your faulty opinion. Usually, the Internet is good at providing confirmation of bias. Backfired on you this time, but it is an opportunity to grow.
Yes, Clinton took numerous trips to Lolita Island. He also had meetings/get-togethers with Epstein in Vegas and elsewhere. The Clintons are (not were, still are) good friends with a woman who was a recruiter of young girls for the island. Don't let the masters of cover-up and their willing boobs (Hello Goosey!) deter you from knowing the truth. Slick Willy is a scum bucket, sleaze bag...that is not news, except to Goosey who thinks Billy Boy is an angel (which he doesn't even believe in).
So far no "hard" evidence, i.e. testimony or video tapes, has surfaced to incriminate Slick Boy in underage sex...probably anyone who could deliver such evidence has already committed "suicide." But, he was on the Lolita Express several times. Only a fool would think scumbag Clinton said "none for me, thanks."
After Epstein's conviction in 2008, the Clintons maintained contact until 2010, when they claim to have cut off ties prior to their ugly daughter's wedding. But, the recruiter woman was invited to the wedding.
Of course, we say "claim" to have cut ties because they are such hardcore liars. More likely Slick Boy has just done a good job of keeping his on-going relationship with Epstein and his "Disney World" Island, under wraps.
If it's evil....the Clintons did it. Period.
Trump quote:
"I've known Jeff for 15 years. Terrific guy," "He's a lot of fun to be with. It is even said that he likes beautiful women as much as I do, and many of them are on the younger side. No doubt about it -- Jeffrey enjoys his social life."
.........
There is media bias and to deny that is being intellectually dishonest..
I think you are comparing apples and oranges when you are talking about traditional media, like CNN/Fox/NBC and platform companies like Google/Apple/FB, particularly those that rely on users being able to find what they are looking for to be successful.
I think companies like Google understand that because of their power they also have responsibility, but I do not believe for one second that Google has any interest in playing political favorites with their platform.
Google’s mission statement is “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.” Having listened to Google execs on earnings conference calls, senior management constantly emphasizes this point. There is no way that this message should be lost on any Google employee. However, users are not generally looking for false information that is being put out by actors that are deliberately promoting false publications and trying to abuse search algorithms to elevate to increase their views. These companies don’t want to police content on their platform (they want to make it easier for users to find the content they seek), but in a world where content generators are abusing the platform and undermining the mission of Google/Alphabet, they have to sort that out somehow.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
