CNN is such a screw-up.
Why CNN sided with Warren against Sanders - and why Dems haven’t learned anything from 2016
CNN is such a screw-up.
Why CNN sided with Warren against Sanders - and why Dems haven’t learned anything from 2016
What did he expect from the dirtiest and worst lying cable "news" company.
And it bias idiocy and hypocrisy continues.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/cnns-j...nt-confederacy
This is media related, not necessarily CNN.. but Rush announced today in his show that he has advanced lung cancer. This is very sad news and I hope he can whip this crap. Professionally, I do not believe that there is any one person alive who has done more to advance conservative values and cause than Rush. I used to like Bill Kristol when I was younger, but realized just how much of an established political elitist hack he really is.
Yep! loved Paul Harvey. Never missed his lunchtime show. "And that...is the rest of the story. This is Paul Harvey....good day!"
We don't get Rush in Natchitoches anymore, have to try to grab a Shreveport or Alex station to listen. Which I do when I can. Based on what I've heard his broadcast career is now history, or soon will be.
Yes, Natchitoches is a Dem stronghold...well, the city is, the parish is right-leaning mostly. The radio stations are located in, owned, by city-dwellers and they are leftists. Rush used to be on...as was Hannity...and both shows were dumped. At first in favor of some leftist radio host but that didn't last a month as advertisers abandoned the station. The owner of one of the stations told me he was receiving daily complaints about the Rush & Hannity programming. Yet! the ratings were good and advertisers were pleased.
The 2020 POTUS election will go something like, City: the Dem 58% Trump 42%, Parish: Trump 52% the Dem 48%. The population is roughly 50-50%, just about 19,000 people in the city and 19,000 out in the parish. Overall "Natchitoches" will support the Dem.
Heard that President Trump was going to award Rush the Medal of Freedom. Very cool if he does.
Really? I thought it was ironic that in a speech that featured more big government than any I'd watched, a guy who used to be a conservative, but now no longer believes in fiscal conservatism was being honored. Rush of 5 years ago would have railed against spending money we don't have on things we don't need.
I hate a cancer diagnosis for anyone.
Time is your friend. Impulse is your enemy. -John Bogle
Well, the House spends the money, so this is not entirely accurate.
The big problem is that our system is so divided politically that we have one of two choices. 1) We can continue to spend like we are, with both sides getting a good bit of what they want but the money being spent inefficiently because the solutions implemented are designed by one party to pander to their voters alone. Obamacare is a great example of this. 2) Have one or the other of the parties dig in and just shut down everything, which is politically unpopular and neither side wants to go there.
What is missing is any effort to work together. That stupid impeachment stunt just made things worse...both sides are dug in now and neither is likely to move at all. I've always said Republicans are really bad seeing issues that need to be addressed by government. Democrats see issues to address everywhere, even where there are none. Together they could probably create a decent solution, but working alone they will fail. Unfortunately Washington has become some sort of frat-boy competition where working together for the good of the country takes a back seat to feuding and childish pranks.
If anyone thinks there is a candidate out there that will unite the country, they are viewing things through a very heavy filter. Trump was probably the most easily malleable president we've had in many decades, but with all the junk that's been thrown at him since he was elected he is now dug in just like the rest of them.