Ah....nice thought but dang that guy is clueless.
Sun Belt commish wants fewer ‘contract games’
Ah....nice thought but dang that guy is clueless.
Sun Belt commish wants fewer ‘contract games’
What?! You know how to post a non-political link?! :icon_wink:
I agree that he's clueless. Two big problems with his theory.
1) The Sunbelt is in no position to negotiate with anyone else, so they can't schedule with any "peer conferences" unless the other parties agree to it. Since he wants this to be a long term "strategy", I can't see it happening. I doubt that any other conferences will agree to schedule long term with the Belt. Mainly because.......
2) Without the money games, programs like ULM would run out of money. Tech schedules games like that too, and we always try to get a home and home series (like the A&M game this week), but every program needs money.
I'm not surprised that he's throwing this against the wall, but I don't think it's going to stick. If he pushes forward anyway, then the programs will be really strapped for cash, and he will run the Sunbelt into the ditch, just like he did the WAC.
What it all boils down to is perception. The Sun Belt actually posted a winning record of 5-2 against Conference USA, the SBC’s biggest rival in recruiting and exposure, last yearBenson angle in promoting the Sun Belt, "we are on par with CUSA".
I found this interesting article in the Tech news archives. The article covers the "Benson Plan" for the WAC in 2003 during the initial conference realignment involving the University of Miami.
For anyone naive enough to think the Sun Belt will improve with Karl Benson in charge, read the article.
http://www.latechsports.com/sports/m...072503aaa.html
So Baghdad Bob moved to the U.S. and took on the identity of KB......
I'm sure that people in the SBC love hearing him say things like this, but history is a great indicator of future performance.
1. Karl Benson is the reason the Mountain West Conference exists. His inept handling of the WAC is why the "Airport Eight" held their secret meeting.
2. The WAC is currently dying a slow and very public death because of Karl Benson's "leadership". Idaho and New Mexico State are in limbo, facing the decision of FCS membership.
He has been nothing but talk at every stop in the past, and this is nothing but more talk. He is the perfect commissioner for the Sunbelt if they don't have any aspirations of improvement. I can't see the financial situation of the SBC improving under old Karl.
If the whole conference moves down a few levels then they can avoid contract games. I see what he is doing. However, I think those schools from the Rocky Mountain region would blow them all away.
If this is what he wants, he needs to be negotiating with the MAC, the closest thing to a peer conference they have. I don't see the MAC going for it, though. They need the money like the SBC teams do. On the other hand, ULL was able to schedule 1-and-1's with us and North Texas got that as well. And 2-and-1's could be do-able. So they don't <i>have</i> to be contract games, though it takes the right situation for it not to be. There does remain the whole "money" thing.
I don't think this is new, though. I think I remember Waters having more-or-less the same thing to say on the subject.
University of Houston '01. Any references to "we" or "us" likely refer to UH. Cheers!
A few of the Sun Belt schools could schedule home-and-home deals with CUSA and even FBS teams based on geography, but not for all their non-conference games. South Alabama has done a good job at scheduling home-and-home and 2-for-1 deals. So have Middle Tennessee State and Western Kentucky. However, most of the Sun Belt schools need the money from the bodybag games.
2 for 1 deals are bad deals unless the non-AQ gets the rare first home game like we did against Cal. We've yet to play the second game at Cal. If we bought that game out, it was never mentioned.
home and home deals against BCS teams are rarely good deals. Let's see how our deal with A&M ends up working out.
One money game per year is mandatory. Two money games per year are the norm. Three money games per year means your AD lacks the ability to schedule or balance the budget.