If Trump’s team used government resources, then they’re right.
If Trump’s team used government resources, then they’re right.
Are you suggesting that Dan Barr can’t both be correct on his statement of law (made as a lawyer) and work for the firm that did opposition research? I don’t really follow your point.
You have to forgive me, I am not really “at the tip of the spear” when it comes to right wing conspiracy theories. When you make a random reference to Hannity fanboy water cooler talk, I am not always current.
Alan Dershowitz says Trump is "playing" Mueller. https://www.cnsnews.com/news/article...laying-mueller Dershowitz voted for Hillary. Mueller's mishandling of this investigation is so bad that it makes it look like he is doing it on purpose. How does somebody that has been recognized at doing his job really good, screw up so bad? Could it be possible that he is intentionally exposing the crooks in the FBI to get rid of them, since he was once a Director and he's now disgusted with their behavior? The evidence shows that the top guys in the FBI were trying to overthrow an election.
Of course - how else would you interpret his recent comments about Mueller after complaining for so long. I am sure Mueller sees through it assuming he even cares what Trump says publicly about him.
Could it be that Mueller realized that he was Rosenstein's and the FBI's insurance plan and he decided he wanted no part of that. Now their plan has backfired on them. Did he put Strzok on the investigation to expose him and Lisa Page and the deputy director. Whether it was intentional or not, he's done a good job. This investigation may not uncover collusion with Russia, but it will uncover a plot by one branch of the government attempting to overthrow a presidential election, which is a much worse crime and a danger to our country. Mueller comes out as a hero for uncovering a plot by the FBI to influence the results of an election.
No. You are back in crazy conspiracy land. This is just Trump trying to play games to give himself cover later.
The investigation has already proven that there was a reason to investigate - whether it ultimately implicates Trump or just members of his campaign, I guess we will see.
Mueller already has enough information to indict McCabe, Strzok, Page, and Comey, and he has a connection between Ohr and Fusion GPS because Ohr's wife was working for Fusion GPS on the dossier. All he needs is the connection of Rosenstein to the FBI crooks. If Sessions doesn't recuse himself, Rosenstein, an Obama appointee, doesn't get to put their insurance plan in place. John Solomon with The Hill has already verified this. It's not just a conspiracy theory. I'm just posting on what I've learned from the media that is working on this.
Yep, the fix was in.
DID THE FBI CONSPIRE TO STOP TRUMP?
Pat Buchanan: 'One need not be a conspiracy nut to conclude the fix was in'
Published: 4 hours ago
The original question the FBI investigation of the Trump campaign was to answer was a simple one: Did he do it?
Did Trump, or officials with his knowledge, collude with Vladimir Putin’s Russia to hack the emails of John Podesta and the DNC, and leak the contents to damage Hillary Clinton and elect Donald Trump?
A year-and-a-half into the investigation, and, still, no “collusion” has been found. Yet the investigation goes on, at the demand of the never-Trump media and Beltway establishment.
Hence, and understandably, suspicions have arisen.
Are the investigators after the truth, or are they after Trump?
Set aside the Trump-Putin conspiracy theory momentarily, and consider a rival explanation for what is going down here:
That, from the outset, Director James Comey and an FBI camarilla were determined to stop Trump and elect Hillary Clinton. Having failed, they conspired to break Trump’s presidency, overturn his mandate and bring him down.
Essential to any such project was first to block any indictment of Hillary for transmitting national security secrets over her private email server. That first objective was achieved 18 months ago.
On July 5, 2016, Comey stepped before a stunned press corps to declare that, given the evidence gathered by the FBI, “no reasonable prosecutor” would indict Clinton. Therefore, that was the course he, Comey, was recommending.
Attorney General Loretta Lynch, compromised by her infamous 35-minute tarmac meeting with Bill Clinton – to discuss golf and grandkids – seconded Comey’s decision.
And so Hillary walked. Why is this suspicious?
First, whether or not to indict was a decision that belonged to the Department of Justice, not Jim Comey or the FBI. His preemption of Justice Department authority was astonishing.
Second, while Comey said in his statement that Hillary had been “extremely careless” with security secrets, in his first draft, Clinton was declared guilty of “gross negligence” – the precise language in the statute to justify indictment.
Who talked Comey into softening the language to look less than criminal? One man was FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, whose wife, Jill, a Virginia state senate candidate, received a munificent PAC contribution of $474,000 from Clinton family friend and big bundler Terry McAuliffe.
Also urging Comey to soften the fatal phrase “gross negligence” was key FBI agent Peter Strzok. In text messages to his FBI lover Lisa Page, Strzok repeatedly vented his detestation of the “idiot” Trump.
After one meeting with “Andy” (McCabe), Strzok told Page an “insurance policy” was needed to keep Trump out of the White House.
Also, it appears Comey began drafting his exoneration statement of Hillary before the FBI had even interviewed her. And when the FBI did, Hillary was permitted to have her lawyers present.
One need not be a conspiracy nut to conclude the fix was in, and a pass for Hillary wired from the get-go. Comey, McCabe, Strzok were not going to recommend an indictment that would blow Hillary out of the water and let the Trump Tower crowd waltz into the White House.
Yet, if Special Counsel Robert Mueller cannot find any Trump collusion with the Kremlin to tilt the outcome of the 2016 election, his investigators might have another look at the Clinton campaign.
For there a Russian connection has been established.
Kremlin agents fabricated, faked, forged or found the dirt on Trump that was passed to ex-British MI6 spy Christopher Steele, and wound up in his “dirty dossier” that was distributed to the mainstream media and the FBI to torpedo Trump.
And who hired Steele to tie Trump to Russia?
Fusion GPS, the oppo research outfit into which the DNC and Clinton campaign pumped millions through law firm Perkins Coie.
Let’s review the bidding.
The “dirty dossier,” a mixture of fabrications, falsehoods and half-truths, created to destroy Trump and make Hillary president, was the product of a British spy’s collusion with Kremlin agents.
In the Dec. 26 issue of the Washington Times, Rowan Scarborough writes that the FBI relied on this Kremlin-Steele dossier of allegations and lies to base their decision “to open a counterintelligence investigation (of Trump).” And press reports “cite the document’s disinformation in requests for court-approved wiretaps.”
If this is true, a critical questions arises:
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/12/did-the-f...8x8hjbGqg1y.99
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2017/12/did-the-f...8x8hjbGqg1y.99
These haters will be jailed.
LEAKING LOVERS?
GOP lawmakers suspect FBI pair's texts could show pattern of planting stories in press
Republican-led committees reportedly are investigating whether FBI officials once involved in Robert Mueller’s Russia probe helped leak to the media, based in part on text messages they exchanged mentioning news outlets.
- Lawmakers finally get critical docs, including key Russia dossier info
- Watchdog reveals how ex-Mueller agents' anti-Trump texts came to light
- 'F TRUMP': Texts between ex-Mueller team members emerge, calling Trump 'loathsome human,' 'an idiot'
- Gowdy on new texts: If someone at FBI was leaking to media, it wouldn't surprise me
Yeppers, more of Obama and the Dems/libs "Deep State" trying to run the country.
'Alarming' memo on FISA abuses must be made public, GOP lawmakers say
'DISTURBING' DETAILS
'Alarming' memo on FISA abuses must be made public, GOP lawmakers say
I hope they get this info out by next week. Congressman Jordan and Gaetz said on Hannity tonight that everybody will be surprised how deep the corruption goes. They also said the Muellar investigation will be over as soon as this info is released because the investigation was started on lies.
If this is as devastating as they are saying then it might not be a question of if the DNC is destroyed but who among the democrats should be saved (note I did not say is worthy of). It appears that the swamp will be drained very rapidly and soon.
WWDog
La Tech
Region and hyphen free since 1894!
Flagship of the University of Louisiana System
Yes it does, and they all need to go down. This is all leading up to a constitutional crisis. The DC establishment has so blatantly attempted to trample our constitution that even the mainstream press will be forced to call for the heads of the deep state thugs that were involved in this conspiracy. Once everything is made public, either the rule of law will prevail, or our constitution will become meaningless and the deep state will have succeeded in taking down this great nation.