Chris Christie - governing without partisanship

[T1]

I guess I need to read up on Christie. Is he more fiscally conservative and socially liberal or are his fiscal policies conservative as well? I admit, I haven't been following politics much since Jindal first won governorship when I told everyone he was running only as a stepping stone, but from the little I've heard or read about Christie since his first becoming a national figure, he seemed to have been fiscally conservative from what I can remember. I don't remember hearing much about his social leanings.

He's a typical Northeastern Republican. Romney, Bush, etc... The establishment will love him, the conservatives will not.

[Woof!]

Yep, a typical clown car type guy.

[Dirtydawg]

He's a typical Northeastern Republican. Romney, Bush, etc... The establishment will love him, the conservatives will not.

I thought Bush was from Texas.

[T1]

I thought Bush was from Texas.

HW

[JuBru]

I see a lot of bashing going on, but no one is actually explaining what Christie has done wrong or give a worthy reason to be against him. Being against libertarianism and the Paul family is a GOOD thing for conservatism and America (excluding fiscal policies, which they are pretty good at even when off base sometimes). Being for surveillance is a good thing.

[Dirtydawg]

I see a lot of bashing going on, but no one is actually explaining what Christie has done wrong or give a worthy reason to be against him. Being against libertarianism and the Paul family is a GOOD thing for conservatism and America (excluding fiscal policies, which they are pretty good at even when off base sometimes). Being for surveillance is a good thing.

Are you using those for examples or is that your actual opinion?

[JuBru]

Are you using those for examples or is that your actual opinion?

Those are the only examples given thus far, and neither are things to hold against Christie nor to think he's doing or has done anything wrong.

And yes, my opinion. I'm mostly against both Pauls and libertarianism. Though there have been breeches, the people are the problem, not the program.

[T1]

Those are the only examples given thus far, and neither are things to hold against Christie nor to think he's doing or has done anything wrong.

And yes, my opinion. I'm against mostly against both Pauls and libertarianism. Though there have been breeches, the people are the problem, not the program.

Christie is probably your guy then.