Sticking with Higgins or back to Young?
I'll stay where I have been since the spring: Higgins.
|
|
|
|
|
Sticking with Higgins or back to Young?
I'll stay where I have been since the spring: Higgins.
Stay with Higgins.
higgins
Neither. Put it up for grabs again. Higgins has no poise or zing on the ball, and he needs to study how you run a football, and how to wrap two hands around it!
I say Higgins. He looked good at times and this team is going to have a rough season. We just seem too undisciplined with the ball and with penalties. Sick right now.
Higgins. Looked like a lot more promising today in one game than Young has looked in 3 games.
Higgins. He played well and was efficient. Must be very coachable with the improvement from Tulane. He can roll out and looks to the middle of the field. That and he's one tough SOB.
Higgins. O-line still pitiful tho.
The whole reach the football out for the pylon thing is out of hand in football. We would have had first and goal at the 1 and chance to go up 17-3.
Still...Higgins.
Good old Memorial Gym
Higgins. I'll take Freshman mistakes trying to make something happen and being aggressive over what we've seen up til now any day. Higgins will learn from these kinds of things. I'm afraid Scotty will never be more than what he already is.
Higgins is not great, but he seems better than Young. I'd stick with him. What is there to lose? We just lost to Tulane and a Kansas team that hasn't beaten an FBS foe until today in consecutive weeks. Our season is shot. Build for the future...or totally tank so we can get a young hungry coach...either way.
Time is your friend. Impulse is your enemy. -John Bogle
I was a big advocate for Harris, but after that game, it is clear that Higgins is our man for the next few years. Great game for his first start against a Big XII team (even a crappy Big XII team).
At least Higgins wasn't a 3 and out machine. Young was just that.
Higgins.
Higgins is going to be a stud! Scotty is a nice backup if he gets hurt.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
