Here we go...
Here we go...
Too much like Fresneck State.
I don't like this logo on our helmets (instead of the perfect logo we already have), but that ugly LaTech logo would be roughly 1 million times worse. It's bad enough we when stick that thing on a cheap plastic cup. Putting it on our football helmets would horrendous.
Maybe I'm missing something, but why is this such a big deal? It's just for one game. Is it that much different than the Army game last year?
While other schools are sending releases out about their new uniforms...our admins get excited about new helmet decals!
UH football unveils new uniforms for 2014
UCLA, adidas Unveil New TECHFIT Football Alternate Uniforms
Sooners, Nike Unveil Additional OU Uniform
What principle? I'm not trying to stoke a fire, I just genuinely don't get the outrage.
Also what qng said.
My point is that we are so disorganized on branding as a whole (which extends to every corner of the university, not just athletics) that we don't need to be introducting *anything* "special" until we nail down a good base.
Other than that, the helmet just looks bad (to me, someone obviously liked it).
If you think BBB is bad, you better check out the comments on facebook. Let's just say that this decal is not very popular.
And to QNG's point, yes, it is lame that our SID is revealing a new decal while other schools are revealing new sets of uniforms from head to toe. It's better for stupid ideas like this be saved as gameday surprises.
I can understand your point. I personally like the bulldog logo even though it's fairly new. I don't think it's too serious of a branding issue though since it's just for one game.