I was thinking about how Rice will be our biggest game(not just for winning the west) on the way home from the bball game. 8-4 looks much better than 7-5. Going to a bowl will give some of the younger guys some extra practice, since it seems some starters won't be able to play. So those guys who can't play in the bowl need to play their butts off against Rice.
I understand why they do it, because college sports has become such a huge money maker. But this is one of my pet peeves. These college players are so babied that they have to have somebody make sure they are going to class and studying. Why can't they learn responsibility and accountability just like other college students have to? That's why once the glory days of playing football are over, so many of them crash and burn because for all their life up to that point, everything was handed to them.
Paris:
That is true of 90%+ of pampered college athletes. And! because it is true, that is another responsibility of the coaches and the staff to monitor. You're right, it shouldn't have to be that way, but it is. So, what we see is another failure on the part of Skippy.
Hell, when I coached soccer in high school, our season began in November and ended in February. After my first year....when I lost 7 starters and 4 other key back-ups to grades! and we got demolished in district play in January/February....new semester starts in January...I became very pro-active with my kids starting when school started in August.
It's the head coach's responsibility...
Back to the title of this thread....this is not our Super Bowl. It is a regular season game vs. a conference foe who is our peer. Back in 2001, our first year in the WAC, and we won it, we beat Rice and Boazy in back to back home regular season games.
This is "big boy" time, I agree with that. It is "put up or shut up" time, I agree with that. But it is also a conference game. It is Rice....for Pete's sake....not Bama!
Pull up your britches....tie your shoes....and act like an effing football team!
I thought this was Jackson's job and he had been doing great up until now.
90%+ ?????? Do tell us where you found that "true" statistic.
Check our APR; check the number of graduates. This is not analogous to your high school soccer team. There is a much bigger staff than the head coach; yes, he holds some accountability. As does the AD. But, there are academic advisors within the department. IF--a big if--they aren't doing their jobs, they should be held accountable (by the HC and AD).
Personally, I think it's 100%, but I was giving some the benefit of the doubt figuring surely, at least 1 out of 10 can do for him/herself. And does!
And thanks for making my case for me. You're right Skippy has the benefit of a staff, someone on his staff, plus someone (several) on the AD's staff that try to keep athletes eligible. What he has to do is monitor the situation and make sure those staffers are doing their jobs AND that the players are taking responsibility for themselves.