+ Reply to Thread
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 37 of 37

Thread: 5 Years of Eligibility?

  1. #31
    2003 BB&B Basketball Pick 'Em Champion inudesu has a reputation beyond reputeinudesu has a reputation beyond reputeinudesu has a reputation beyond reputeinudesu has a reputation beyond reputeinudesu has a reputation beyond reputeinudesu has a reputation beyond reputeinudesu has a reputation beyond reputeinudesu has a reputation beyond reputeinudesu has a reputation beyond reputeinudesu has a reputation beyond reputeinudesu has a reputation beyond repute inudesu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Fort Worth, Texas
    Posts
    13,686

    Re: 5 Years of Eligibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by HogDawg View Post
    Won't they likely raise the scholarship limit above 85, because they'll need to fill an extra (5th) class? Of course, that will in turn leave fewer quality recruits available for the G5's to recruit. The P5's will be one-step closer to going back to stockpiling athletes like they did before the 85 limit was imposed.
    Nobody know. This whole discussion just came from an off-the-cuff suggestion (actually I think it's probably the kind of thing ADs and coaches chat about just like us message board squirrels).

    But as I said above, while the Alabamas and Texases of the world might be in favor of also raising scholarship limits (just like they'd always be open to that idea), the Mississippi States and Baylors and Kansases of the world (along with every G5 school) would be hard against it. Not only would it theoretically reduce our talent pool (although as HT says, the chance to play might out-weigh some of that) each of those scholarships would actually "cost" the school twice as much because they'd have to balance them with scholarships for women (which at this point for most schools would also mean adding a sport).

    They could just reduce the yearly limit, or even leave it the same and let the schools deal with balancing the numbers.

  2. #32
    Champ Rooster has a reputation beyond reputeRooster has a reputation beyond reputeRooster has a reputation beyond reputeRooster has a reputation beyond reputeRooster has a reputation beyond reputeRooster has a reputation beyond reputeRooster has a reputation beyond reputeRooster has a reputation beyond reputeRooster has a reputation beyond reputeRooster has a reputation beyond reputeRooster has a reputation beyond repute Rooster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    rural America
    Posts
    7,059

    Re: 5 Years of Eligibility?

    A similar subject has been on sports talk radio all day today...Big 10(I think) is looking at making kids redshirt...if that is the case, I think some of those kids will not go to those schools. I think it is good the way it is now. A kid has 5 years to play 4...
    “Ability is what you're capable of doing. Motivation determines what you do. Attitude determines how well you do it.”
    Lou Holtz - Football Coach

    "A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have." - Thomas Jefferson

    "Bring back the rotary phone so we don't have to press 1 for English."
    www.casadice.com

  3. #33
    Champ Wade_Antley has a reputation beyond reputeWade_Antley has a reputation beyond reputeWade_Antley has a reputation beyond reputeWade_Antley has a reputation beyond reputeWade_Antley has a reputation beyond reputeWade_Antley has a reputation beyond reputeWade_Antley has a reputation beyond reputeWade_Antley has a reputation beyond reputeWade_Antley has a reputation beyond reputeWade_Antley has a reputation beyond reputeWade_Antley has a reputation beyond repute Wade_Antley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Vancouver Island BC Canada
    Posts
    1,057

    Re: 5 Years of Eligibility?

    Yeah, I saw that. The Big 10 is looking at making it mandatory that freshmen would not be allowed to play football and MBB. In a way that would help G5 schools because there's something that we can offer, play right away. But I'm sure there is going to be some evil twist to it that hasn't come out yet.

  4. #34
    Champ Houston Techsan has a reputation beyond reputeHouston Techsan has a reputation beyond reputeHouston Techsan has a reputation beyond reputeHouston Techsan has a reputation beyond reputeHouston Techsan has a reputation beyond reputeHouston Techsan has a reputation beyond reputeHouston Techsan has a reputation beyond reputeHouston Techsan has a reputation beyond reputeHouston Techsan has a reputation beyond reputeHouston Techsan has a reputation beyond reputeHouston Techsan has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Missouri City, TX
    Posts
    4,350

    Re: 5 Years of Eligibility?

    I think it was 1972 that the NCAA let freshmen play varsity sports - at least in the University Division. Prior to that it was up to the individual conferences. The old GSC let freshmen play but they couldn't play, at least in the regional basketball tournament even for the small college division. So it's been over forty years. I don't even think they got an extra year if they red shirted. In other words all they got was three years of eligibility. The reasoning was that they had to pass college courses one whole year to be academically eligible. This did mitigate the "stock piling" somewhat since most "small college" conferences allowed freshmen to play right away. The freshmen from the small colleges could play in regular season games against the "university division" colleges. Terry Bradshaw played as a freshmen against Alabama for at least a few plays.

  5. #35
    Champ RealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond reputeRealityCheck has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    14,940

    Re: 5 Years of Eligibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by maddawg View Post
    Did the guy who proposed this give a new number on roster limits or scholarship limits? Roster and 'ship limits would likely change. One advantage for the schools is that it would simplify things.

    One of the old school guys can help, but before the current rules freshman were not allowed to play (I think) and that was not too long ago...back in the late 70s maybe?
    There has been no freshman ineligibility since Tech joined Division I. And the scholarship limits for football were 25/95 before they were dropped to the current 25/85.

  6. #36
    Super Moderator PawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond repute PawDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    57,490

    Re: 5 Years of Eligibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by RealityCheck View Post
    There has been no freshman ineligibility since Tech joined Division I. And the scholarship limits for football were 25/95 before they were dropped to the current 25/85.
    Must have been an SEC thing. I have a friend who played for lsu and they had a freshman team in 1978ish. Not sure how all that worked except I've heard him say he got hurt playing against Rice in a freshman game.

  7. #37
    Champ techman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ruston
    Posts
    17,576

    Re: 5 Years of Eligibility?

    Quote Originally Posted by Wade_Antley View Post
    Yeah, I saw that. The Big 10 is looking at making it mandatory that freshmen would not be allowed to play football and MBB. In a way that would help G5 schools because there's something that we can offer, play right away. But I'm sure there is going to be some evil twist to it that hasn't come out yet.
    Probably something like....."If you redshirt for us, your freshman stipend will be increased by $5,000(just because we print money and can do that)."

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts