Nobody know. This whole discussion just came from an off-the-cuff suggestion (actually I think it's probably the kind of thing ADs and coaches chat about just like us message board squirrels).
But as I said above, while the Alabamas and Texases of the world might be in favor of also raising scholarship limits (just like they'd always be open to that idea), the Mississippi States and Baylors and Kansases of the world (along with every G5 school) would be hard against it. Not only would it theoretically reduce our talent pool (although as HT says, the chance to play might out-weigh some of that) each of those scholarships would actually "cost" the school twice as much because they'd have to balance them with scholarships for women (which at this point for most schools would also mean adding a sport).
They could just reduce the yearly limit, or even leave it the same and let the schools deal with balancing the numbers.