Good work. Email those numbers to Teddy and I bet he will work them in to his pregame. He comes up with some entertaining stuff.
Good work. Email those numbers to Teddy and I bet he will work them in to his pregame. He comes up with some entertaining stuff.
I was kind of shocked to see that all we need is 27 points.... good defense sure makes it easier to win.
And the only teams holding us under 27 are the P5 teams for the most part...plus Marshall and ODU?? (we had 24 at the half on them, just 1 FG in the 2nd half would have won it, we lost in OT).
"27 points" goes back to 2013 too. We are 17-2 when we score 27 or more. We are 1-14 when we don't. (the 1 win was FIU in 2013... we scored 23 pts).
I wonder if that's the "successful formula" Holtz speaks of? "If I get 28 points, I'm going to win 98% of the time."
At Uconn he was 23-4 when scoring 27 or more.
At ECU he was 26-1 when scoring 27 or more.
At USF he was 11-5 when scoring 27 or more.
At Tech he is 17-2 when scoring 27 or more.
Total: 77-12 when scoring 27 or more points. (might have found a pattern here).
His winning percentage at 27 or more points is 87%.
His winning percentage at fewer than 27 points is 31%.
The data backs up the perception: we are pedal-to-metal in the first half, but slack off in the 3rd quarter, followed by another spike in the 4th (of course, if we're losing then, it's probably too late).