Originally Posted by
DawgyNWindow
Exactly. I think they should spend the next six months "Borking" the guy and then voting him down.
I am amazed at how many times I hear stuff like "we will see how this nominee feels about the second amendment". Like it's in the wheelhouse of a justice to re-write the constitution based on "feelings" about some article or another.
I think if there is not a history of full devotion to the principles of the constitution (and not the stuff they wish was in the constitution), there is no path forward regardless of eduction or experience or anything else.
I am all for hearings, accompanied by public ridicule and political grandstanding (just like Bork and Thomas had to endure).