NLULM wants to avoid six home games in 2019

[HogDawg]

At $400k to UNM what would you ball park profit (loss)?

A home game like that is probably a breakeven deal for our program.

[detltu]

That's what I figured.

[Champ967]

That's what I figured.

TMac => greener pastures
HCSH => AD
Peterson => HC
Ratatat => OC

2-4 yrs, tops.

[RougeDawg]

Maybe it is time to approach ULM with a one and done in Ruston. We could pay them better than UNM, Their fans who want to could easily come to the game and their travel costs would be minimal. Even a 2 for 1 would be ok.

Listening to the Trump Clinton debate and this is still the craziest thing I've heard today.

[Champ967]

I think we should play northeast.

[detltu]

Listening to the Trump Clinton debate and this is still the craziest thing I've heard today.

You think paying ULM for a home game is crazy. My argument against playing them was always that we had to return the home game. That may no longer be the case.

[PawDawg]

You think paying ULM for a home game is crazy. My argument against playing them was always that we had to return the home game. That may no longer be the case.

We give them 10k tickets and they give us 10K tickets. $20 each. Money and remaining tickets have to be turned in to home team August 15. As usual we would dominate the crowd in both locations.

[DJDAWG]

You think paying ULM for a home game is crazy. My argument against playing them was always that we had to return the home game. That may no longer be the case.

Good observation. But, they may still insist on home-and-home simply due to pride, although, they're not griping about ULL stealing their name, so, maybe not.

[SicemDawgz]

Maybe we could do like Arkansas. We could get them to play in Ruston, we keep the gate and let them call it a home game.

[detltu]

Good observation. But, they may still insist on home-and-home simply due to pride, although, they're not griping about ULL stealing their name, so, maybe not.

I don't doubt that. If they want a home and home, we don't play them. I'm not advocating a 1 for 1.