Not quite - I said % and score at the end of the 3rd qtr...Originally Posted by T1
What? You just want us to only count 6 possessions.
Through the first 6 possessions:
USM: 17-7
Texas: 13-7
Tech: 14-0
|
|
|
|
|
Not quite - I said % and score at the end of the 3rd qtr...What? You just want us to only count 6 possessions.
Through the first 6 possessions:
USM: 17-7
Texas: 13-7
Tech: 14-0
''Don't be a bad dagh..."
At the end of the 3rd quarter, USM and Texas both had 11 possessions, Tech had 6. If we had 5 more possessions, scoring TDs at a 50% rate, our score would have been 28.5 to 0. USM was 31-7 (with a defensive TD) and Texas was 34-7. How's that?
My head hurts. Check my math.
I think this is the correct math:
USM: 24 offensive points on 11 drives (2.18 points per drive)
Texas: 34 offensive points on 11 drives (3.09 points per drive)
Tech: 14 points on 6 drives (2.33 points per drive)
So with 5 more possessions at 2.33 points per drive, we would have had 25.67 points at the end of the 3rd quarter.
Focus
Statistics can be fun
WKU added. Much better. Second half crashed, but we won.
Time of possession in the 2nd half:
LA Tech 22:36
WKU 7:24
That was a TON of points scored in under 8 minutes.
WKU outscored Tech in the 4th quarter 21-3.
Just think if Holtz would have given them 9 minutes. We would have lost by 20.
Just imagine had Barnes not nailed a 54 yarder. We would have went to OT, and I have ZERO confidence in winning in OT.
I hope Skip never starts a commune in South America after his coaching days are over. But if he does, and I know you'll be one of his faithful children, just don't drink the kool-aid.Just think if Holtz would have given them 9 minutes. We would have lost by 20.
Go back into hiding. We play USM later in the year... see you then.
So emotional...
Higgins Is The Answer!!!!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
