President Trump

[Guisslapp]

Give it up. Told ya before your lies simply don't work here. obummer did more wrong, violated the Constitution, and was engaged in more corruption in any one week than all three of those presidents combined over their full tenures.

That is objectively untrue even though you disguised it as an opinion.

[FriscoDog]

IMO, there is a double standard when it comes to the Swamp. They protect their own.. For example: FBI Intelligence Supervisor, caught with child porn on his computer, he was fired, but DOJ decided not to prosecute. Anywhere else, you or I would have gone to jail. Flynn allegedly lies to FBI, they go after him. Comey, Brennan, Clapper, all have lied to Congress, yet nothing happens. Several former FBI and DOJ officials under Obama admin since this whole Russia thing started and Mueller's team have been fired, or demoted, no criminal prosecutions. My last hope is that Durham will being charges and people get perp walked, otherwise our country is truly lost.

[Guisslapp]

IMO, there is a double standard when it comes to the Swamp. They protect their own.. For example: FBI Intelligence Supervisor, caught with child porn on his computer, he was fired, but DOJ decided not to prosecute. Anywhere else, you or I would have gone to jail. Flynn allegedly lies to FBI, they go after him. Comey, Brennan, Clapper, all have lied to Congress, yet nothing happens. Several former FBI and DOJ officials under Obama admin since this whole Russia thing started and Mueller's team have been fired, or demoted, no criminal prosecutions. My last hope is that Durham will being charges and people get perp walked, otherwise our country is truly lost.

Your facts are all wrong.

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2020/f200414.pdf

The fact that Trump was not held to account for his unconstitutional abuses of power and obstruction, though, does prove we are lost.

[detltu]

Your facts are all wrong.

https://oig.justice.gov/reports/2020/f200414.pdf

The fact that Trump was not held to account for his unconstitutional abuses of power and obstruction, though, does prove we are lost.

Whoever wrote that should be fired:
(OIG) initiated this investigation upon the receipt of information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI) Inspection Division (INSD) alleging that a then FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst (SIA) had stated, during a routine FBI security inquiry, that the SIA had viewed and downloaded child pornography from the internet several years earlier. The SIA denied ever receiving or sending child pornography.

Translation:
They started an investigation because the FBI says the SIA admitted during a security inquiry that he had child porn. The SIA denied he had child porn.

None of the images were determined to be evidence of child pornography. No pornographic material, or evidence pertinent to the investigation, was identified on the SIA’s FBI-issued devices. Based on the SIA’s statements during the security interview, the OIG investigation concluded that the SIA had knowingly possessed child pornography, in violation of federal law and FBI policy.

Translation: We didn't find any child pornography, but determined he had child pornography.

Also I'm not entirely sure what facts you are saying he got wrong. It sounds like they chose to fire him but not prosecute him because they didn't have any actual evidence. I guess he didn't get caught with child porn so that is incorrect.

[Guisslapp]

Whoever wrote that should be fired:
(OIG) initiated this investigation upon the receipt of information from the Federal Bureau of Investigation ( FBI) Inspection Division (INSD) alleging that a then FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst (SIA) had stated, during a routine FBI security inquiry, that the SIA had viewed and downloaded child pornography from the internet several years earlier. The SIA denied ever receiving or sending child pornography.

Translation:
They started an investigation because the FBI says the SIA admitted during a security inquiry that he had child porn. The SIA denied he had child porn.

None of the images were determined to be evidence of child pornography. No pornographic material, or evidence pertinent to the investigation, was identified on the SIA’s FBI-issued devices. Based on the SIA’s statements during the security interview, the OIG investigation concluded that the SIA had knowingly possessed child pornography, in violation of federal law and FBI policy.

Translation: We didn't find any child pornography, but determined he had child pornography.

Also I'm not entirely sure what facts you are saying he got wrong. It sounds like they chose to fire him but not prosecute him because they didn't have any actual evidence. I guess he didn't get caught with child porn so that is incorrect.

My read is that he said he had accessed it in the past in a an interview (perhaps to get some sort of classified information clearance). Based on that they investigated further and could not actually find evidence that he possessed it.

So the facts that were wrong were: “Supervisor got caught with child porn on his computer”. The report, however, literally says he didn’t.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

If anyone should be subject to criminal referral it is Nunes for his involvement in the Ukraine extortion plot.

😂 How’s it feel being wrong 100% of the time?

[TYLERTECHSAS]

7 convictions that I know of for Reagan.

11 for Nixon.

Zero for Carter.

1 for Obama (Petreus).

Biased main stream media and liberal judges
turning away from the truth and ignoring justice.

[FriscoDog]

Biased main stream media and liberal judges
turning away from the truth and ignoring justice.

Also the politicization and weaponization of the Intel agencies, DOJ which reached its pinnacle under Obama. Could you imagine the screeches from Goosey and others if Trump did something like Fast and Furious.. Or if Barr had a tarmac meeting with Flynn?

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Trump was right again.

Trump’s Warning About ‘When Looting Starts Shooting Starts’ Completely Vindicated

https://www.breitbart.com/

[dawg80]

[TYLERTECHSAS]

How many did he pepper spray to get that shot?

There were no rubber bullets nor tear gas used the other day. Smoke bombs yes.

[johnnylightnin]

There were no rubber bullets nor tear gas used the other day. Smoke bombs yes.

Pepper balls and smoke...same effect. Reports today are that tear gas canisters were found at the scene.

[Guisslapp]

There were no rubber bullets nor tear gas used the other day. Smoke bombs yes.

Most folks except for those being extremely pedantic would call it tear gas. Here is what was shot (CM Skat Shell):

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wus...0-3f7d908139dd

The OC gas causes the same tears and tight breath as tear gas, and comes out green.

Reporters are also reporting recovered CS shells from the scene, which is the same ingredient as tear gas.


https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/polit...BCq?li=BBnb7Kz

[JuBru]

Clinton's photo was taken at the Foundry United Methodist Church after a church service in July 2000 as he prepared to host Israel's Ehud Mubarak and Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat at Camp David the following weekend.

Trump's photo was taken in front of St. John's Episcopal Church after he got his feelings hurt being called Bunker Baby and Bunker Bitch. There was no reason or justification for Trump (or Barr or Hicks or whoever ordered it) to forcibly clear protestors, remove the priest, and take a photo with a book he's never read.

Stephen King is right:

Dear fundamentalist Christian Trump supporters: If Obama had held the Bible backwards and upside down, you would immediately have called him the Antichrist.

Side Note: Getty Images charges $175 for a small, $375 for a medium, and $499 for a large version of the Clinton image for standard editorial rights.

[johnnylightnin]

“It’s A Bible.”