Originally Posted by TYLERTECHSAS
Sorry Guisslapp my friend but you were the believer of lies via the socialist and evil media and politicos.
TRUMP WINS!
NO COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION*
NO PROOF OF CRIMES
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry Guisslapp my friend but you were the believer of lies via the socialist and evil media and politicos.
TRUMP WINS!
NO COLLUSION
NO OBSTRUCTION*
NO PROOF OF CRIMES
Where is the report?
As they all should.
PAPER: APOLOGIES TO PRESIDENT TRUMP...
Apologies to President Trump
BY SHARYL ATTKISSON, OPINION CONTRIBUTOR — 03/25/19 09:30 AM EDT 1,140THE VIEWS EXPRESSED BY CONTRIBUTORS ARE THEIR OWN AND NOT THE VIEW OF THE HILL
New Day For White House...
Re-election weapon...
GOODWIN: HILLARY'S BIG LIE...
PAPER: Apologies to President Trump...
Trumpcult last week: Mueller is a lying Democrap Deep State liberal MSM hack! Witch hunt!Trumpcult this week: Everything Barr says about Mueller report is inerrant gospel!
Trumpcult last week: Just bc Hillary wasn't charged doesn't mean she's innocent! Lock her up!
Trumpcult this week: There was not enough evidence to indict the President, therefore he is innocent
Your second example is actually on to something I think.
No, Muller is still a POS liberal
Hillary was never investigated so she was not going to be charged.
“Hillary was never investigated”
Lolz
These two things are very different.
The facts related to Hillary did not indicate there was no evidence (as laid out on national TV by Comey). As we know now, requests were made to him to change his description of her transgressions so that they would not rise to the level of criminality, and he dutifully did as he was told. She was NOT innocent....maybe it was white privilege that got her off?
There was no evidence that Trump engaged in those activities (which you really should have SOME evidence before starting a prosecution...don't you think?). He was presumed guilty and a fishing expedition was employed to try and find something/anything to tie him to something they really had no evidence he had anything to do with.
Trump was not my candidate (and Obama certainly was not), but he was elected to office in a free and fair election. This is a good day for America, and I hope they figure out how to flush the partisan poop out of our governmental bureaucracies.....because they came awfully close to destroying the country.
Just to add....what would the MSM and anti-Trumper (same thing..almost) narrative be if Muller's report had said the Russian "matter" indicated that Trump and others in his campaign had unwittingly provided, through carelessness, access to our electronic voting totals.....but no reasonable prosecutor would take such a case and he recommends nothing be done?
I'd speculate the capitalists running those media corporations will employ whichever narrative they believe will maximize viewers / readers in order to sell the most ads so as to maximize shareholders' ROI.
I think they have found that pushing a narrative is more profitable than reporting the news, but the narrative of choice is largely unimportant. They build their organization around the narrative they find more appealing.
They don't have any obligation to "report the news". They exist ONLY to realize profit for shareholders. They will sell what sells.
Remember, if a thing is free for you, you're not the customer. Your attention is the product that's being sold.
So whether you consume MSM because you expect it to "report the news", or if you just enjoy the adrenaline rush from being outraged, it makes no difference to the advertisers, nor the shareholders. They got you either way.
Oh yes! look how the libtards are changing their tune
It's all the left has: lies. WAKE UP! join the rest of us in reality.
I doubt if the shareholders like the 275 million lawsuit CNN has against them for reporting fake news about Nick Sandman. CNN thought they were way too big for a "little unimportant" kid from Covington, Kentucky. I only watch CNN for laughs. They're so full of themselves that they could care less about reporting the news accurately. They feel like their agenda is more important.
I've never actively watched CNN nor MSNBC, so I wouldn't know what they say. But if they're not capitalist ventures, who's keeping the lights on? Are they run by volunteers?
Do you see advertisements on Fox News? If so, then you are the product being sold. They will say whatever they need to say to keep you entertained and tuned in. They're not on tv because of altruism. They are on the air to make money for stockholders.
public broadcasting shoots down your theory
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
