Originally Posted by
FriscoDog
Interesting findings on DOJ study on FISA warrants:
Michael horowitz found 17 critical errors, omissions, and falsehoods in the fisa warrant on carter page.
The DOJ and the fisa court took the extraordinary step of invalidating these warrants when they found out about the errors.
Horowitz then was curious: are these many errors commonplace during the fisa process, or are they rare? His reasoning was simple. If all fisa warrants contained many errors, it would serve as a defense against accusations that the fbi was specifically out to get trump. If the carter page warrants were out of the ordinary in the amount of errors they contained, it would lend credence to the idea that the fbi WAS out to get trump and his team.
Horowitz ordered 29 random fisa warrants (not including page's) to be examined.
the results are in.....
of the 29 warrants, there were 2 ERRORS TOTAL. Aka, each warrant had .07 errors. More critically, NONE OF THE WARRANTS WERE DEEMED INVALID. aka, they all satisifed the fisa court in their accuracy and credibility.
carter page's warrant had 17 ERRORS, and WAS DEEMED INVALID, unlike the other 29 randomly chosen fisa's.
The amount of errors in page's fisa was 242 TIMES HIGHER than the 29 random chosen fisa's.
this TAKES AWAY AN FBI TALKING POINT, that the mistakes in the page warrant were part of a larger fbi problem.
nope, the trump campaign fisa warrant was uniquely tainted.
this is what john durham will use in court to prove criminal intent.