As sick as I am about the actual game, I'm equally as sick about the revenue and fan interest we left on the table by not hosting the championship in Shreveport.
|
|
|
|
|
As sick as I am about the actual game, I'm equally as sick about the revenue and fan interest we left on the table by not hosting the championship in Shreveport.
Which leads to the question of who gets the proceed from the "conference" championship game? Not that it really matters because we know no one will be there in Bowling Green if it's the same as last year.Originally Posted by THEarmada
100% chance of rain with highs in the 40's. It would have been a major embarrassment imo.
Have you considered those Dogs?
We might not have had 10K at the game. Ferrell and Lang would have had enough ammo to last for years...
http://www.accuweather.com/en/us/shr...weather/329148
I did get to meet this guy, his wife and son who sat in front of us at the game. He likes to fist bump when Mississippi Southern scores.
http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0344196/bio
It is all managed by the conference as a championship event and we would have seen no more money from playing here vs there. CUSA covers travel expenses, takes in all the revenue, and the profits go to the Conference as a whole.
Well maybe a little because of a little higher attendance.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
