Have you always been this obsessed with boofing? If you are looking for someone to boof you, you are barking up the wrong tree. Maybe you should talk to one of your frat bros about it or Kavanaugh.Originally Posted by atobulldog
|
|
|
|
|
Have you always been this obsessed with boofing? If you are looking for someone to boof you, you are barking up the wrong tree. Maybe you should talk to one of your frat bros about it or Kavanaugh.
That may be the case if we are looking for the middle between the two extremes, but I define the middle as where the majority of people fall on the spectrum. I don't care if the next president is more in the middle, but I would like someone who can encourage dialogue and maybe reel in some of the crazies (on both sides). I have said I will probably vote for Trump in 2020 (despite not voting for him in 2016) but Trump is not the guy to bring people down from the ledge. He may be the person to push people off the ledge enough that the more rational among us can decide to avoid a similar fate.
I am sorry boofy, you are insinuating boofing means something else and have consistently projected your boofing on fraternity guys. I know you really like to project, but it is embarrassing at this point. Seek help boofy.
I guess I am the only one of the two of us that has learned to use google.
https://www.vox.com/culture/2018/9/2...-yearbook-boof
Thanks for the often wrong, ie Gaza Bridge, Vox's post on the matter. I found the following rather interesting:
Seems to me that it is all conjecture and fantasy ideas of your type hoping against hope that it means whatever dastardly definition to discredit him. It turns out you have no proof and any "corroboration" from Vox is wishful thinking.It’s very difficult to find established usage of “boof” in publications of the era
Thanks for the often wrong, ie Gaza Bridge, Vox's post on the matter. I found the following rather interesting:
Seems to me that it is all conjecture and fantasy ideas of your type hoping against hope that it means whatever dastardly definition to discredit him. It turns out you have no proof and any "corroboration" from Vox is wishful thinking.It’s very difficult to find established usage of “boof” in publications of the era
Still obsessed with boof? Pretty sure, given the context of Kavanaugh and Judge’s yearbook quotes it doesn’t mean “fart”, but you right wingers will believe whatever you need to believe to score Pyrrhic victories.
Maybe it is open to debate as to what exactly is being passed through the anus when one boofs, but those references that actually published the term suggest it was either drugs/booze (as it is used today) or a penis (Teen Wolf is suggestive of how it was understood then). This seems to be a term that is used more frequently where only guys gather, particularly Catholic guys, but most people that claim to know what it means come from boys school backgrounds (Jesuit or otherwise).
I never really cared about the boofing reference as a sign of his lack of trustworthiness. You are the one that seems to be hyperfocused on it - whether that is because you have a general interest in boofing or whether you mistakenly believe this is the lynchpin of the truthfulness attack on Kavanaugh (it isn’t).
Project if you must, boofy. I was gigging you on it because it is pure applesauce, and I kept coming back because of your attempts to project it on to fraternity members. I never claimed it was a lynch pin of anything, to me it was a stupid, petty, and vapid argument that should have no business coming from a US Senator. But hey, Vox thinks it is important.
It’s all good, man. Whatever gets your rocks off.
RNC chairwoman responds to Eric Holder's call to 'kick' Republicans
- Where's the outrage over Hillary's call for a 'civil' war? - New York Post
https://nypost.com/2018/10/09/wheres...r-a-civil-war/
1 day ago - You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you ... Her comments, then, are as reckless as bringing a can of gasoline to a ...
Fake headline. But also she was a Republican, not a leftist, when she said what Jeb “should have” done.
BS, she's done similar before as posted below.
Daily Wire reporter Ryan Saavedra – who captured Wallace’s call for violence – pointed out that the MSNBC host once proclaimed she wanted to "wring" the "neck" of White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders.
Which part of what I said is BS? (1) that she was a Republican at the time of the statement, or (2) that she said what he “should have done” rather than tell him what to do?
But if Republicans statements about committing violence inflame your sensibilities, how about these doozies:
“I’d like to punch him in the face.” (Regarding a protestor at a Trump rally)
“Maybe he should have been roughed up” (again, regarding a citizen exercising their First Amendment rights)
“Part of the problem is no one wants to hurt each other anymore.” (Same context)
“I don’t know if I’ll do the fighting myself or if other people will” (again, regarding protestors)
“The audience hit back. That’s what we need a little bit more of” (Same)
“If you do (hurt him), I’ll defend you in court, don’t worry about it” (Same)
“I’ll beat the crap out of you” (Same)
“Knock the crap out of him, would you? I promise you, I will pay your legal fees” (Same)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote