Originally Posted by
Bearpaw
Guisslapp, have you asked every scientific expert their opinion? And to answer that, no you have not. You have been spoonfed from your teachers, mentors, friends, and those articles you have read that evolution is the dominant, more logical position. You don't actually know its true, you only believe what you have been told. Guisslapp, you do realize that evolution, i.e. the theory of its existence, is only a false theory. It is not what is actually, objectively happening, only a possible/partially true, objectively false interpretation. Thus, it is false; as you agreed in our prior discussion, such things need refining over time. All theories made by subjective beings are pseudo-true, and can only be proved to be true by an objective being.
And you can compare evolution to creation. Creation could have happened with an intelligence in mind. Even if evolution has been the case since, which we can never actually "prove" only interpret our observations, does not give proof that creation did not happen. It may allow interpretations that everything which is here now may have evolved from something else, but those "something else's" could have still been created by an intelligent being. You Guisslapp believe in evolution, you do not have proof in its existence, but you blindly believe your small observations, and the interpretations of the observations of those before you.
You blindly believe in what you have not seen. To include DNA, which we cannot actually see with our own eyes, but we use human, and fallible, instruments to detect its patterns and visualize its makeup. Thus, without actually seeing, tasting, touching, hearing, or smelling DNA, you blindly believe in its existence. I've gotta say, that blind belief sure sounds pretty "illogical to me", as "illogical" as you call those who believe and want a relationship with an objective being...