Russia

[TYLERTECHSAS]

They are trying to stall and run out the clock in the hopes that the dems take over the house and all of this can be swept under the rug.

We need a special investigator appointed to look into this before the midterm elections.

Yeppers, trying to run the clock "trying to protect Obama's corruption of the FBI, Clapper, Comey and ex Obama CIA head Brennan as well as the truth of the Deep State of the Liberals. All of the Democrat Congressman and Senators are all trying to cover for Obama and Hillary. They want to slow play it until the Nov. elections hoping for a majority. This also why they and the Justice Dept. won't give up any of the material requested by the House. The Liberals don't want America seeing how corrupt and evil (Deep State) they really are. Give it up Guisslapp.", as I stated above.

[Guisslapp]

They are trying to stall and run out the clock in the hopes that the dems take over the house and all of this can be swept under the rug.

We need a special investigator appointed to look into this before the midterm elections.

Check the date and the documents requested.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

And did they provide those documents? This was back over a year ago when the special counsel was being appointed.

Dang it! Do your own reading and fact checking. You sir are lazy.

Still a ton of documents that they won't turn over including those on Hillary as well.

thehill.com/.../382764-doj-gives-house-intel-original-document-that-prompted-russia
Apr 11, 2018 - The Justice Department has provided House lawmakers with access to a ... had requested access to the unredacted document, complaining that ... The New York Times reported inDecember that the federal probe — now in the ... counter to claims by some Republicans that the FBI used information from an ...



https://www.washingtonpost.com/...in.../b3da543e-5d06-11e8-a4a4-c070ef53f315_stor...
5 days ago - At Trump's behest, Justice Department agrees to expand Russia investigation ... interference in the 2016 election to include "any irregularities" in FBI tactics. ... from the Justice Department, which had been reluctant to turn over materials ... two people familiar with the requestsaid, though White House press ...

[Guisslapp]

What documents are they not turning over to the oversight committee presently?

[DawgyNWindow]

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._happened.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...oundation.html

No wonder the dems hate Fox News. They report the stuff the rest of the MSM (the propaganda arm of the dem party) don't want you to know. They just continue on with their 91% negative coverage, whipping up the ill-informed part of the population with hate and biased "analysis".

Journalism is dead in America. Hyper-partisan dem Adam Schiff is about as fair and balanced as a typical "reporter" these days.

[DONW]

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi..._happened.html

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018...oundation.html

No wonder the dems hate Fox News. They report the stuff the rest of the MSM (the propaganda arm of the dem party) don't want you to know. They just continue on with their 91% negative coverage, whipping up the ill-informed part of the population with hate and biased "analysis".

Journalism is dead in America. Hyper-partisan dem Adam Schiff is about as fair and balanced as a typical "reporter" these days.

MSNBC and CNN are 100 % negative on covering Trump. I wonder if they're covering the guy Trump just got out of jail in Venezuala today. They'll put some kind of negative spin on it.

[dawg80]

MSNBC and CNN are 100 % negative on covering Trump. I wonder if they're covering the guy Trump just got out of jail in Venezuala today. They'll put some kind of negative spin on it.

Libtards: So, Trump got some guy out of jail. That's what POTUS' are supposed to do. What's Trump want for doing it, a cookie? And besides, how long has Trump been president now, more than year. What took him so long to get this poor wretch out of a Venzy prison.....sheeesh!

[Guisslapp]

MSNBC and CNN are 100 % negative on covering Trump. I wonder if they're covering the guy Trump just got out of jail in Venezuala today. They'll put some kind of negative spin on it.

90% of the news they report on Trump is negative because 90% of the stuff Trump says and does is moronic. The other 10%, they give him credit for.

[Guisslapp]

MSNBC and CNN are 100 % negative on covering Trump. I wonder if they're covering the guy Trump just got out of jail in Venezuala today. They'll put some kind of negative spin on it.

If you want to know what they said about the prisoner release it is easy to find. But feel free to wallow in your own ignorance.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/05/26/polit...eed/index.html

[TYLERTECHSAS]

RUDY: In no case can he be subpoenaed or indicted...
President's legal advisers: Misleading journalists is not a crime...

[Guisslapp]

RUDY: In no case can he be subpoenaed or indicted...
President's legal advisers: Misleading journalists is not a crime...

It is almost as if you think that these are things to celebrate.

If Trump is forced to testify he will have to choose between admitting he has been lying all along to the public or to continue the lie in front of federal agents and get impeached.

[DawgyNWindow]

If Trump is forced to testify he will have to choose between admitting he has been lying all along to the public or to continue the lie in front of federal agents and get impeached.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

RUDY: In no case can he be subpoenaed or indicted...
President's legal advisers: Misleading journalists is not a crime...

It is almost as if you think that these are things to celebrate.

If Trump is forced to testify he will have to choose between admitting he has been lying all along to the public or to continue the lie in front of federal agents and get impeached.

Well of course I want to celebrate. Liberal lawyers like yourself are just trying to entrap the best President we've had since Reagan with some bogus and meaningless question.

[Guisslapp]

Well of course I want to celebrate. Liberal lawyers like yourself are just trying to entrap the best President we've had since Reagan with some bogus and meaningless question.

Why don’t you take a step back and think about the two legal/moral theories you are celebrating.

1. A sitting president cannot be subpoenaed or indicted. They are above the law.

2. Presidents can’t be held legally accountable for lies that they propagate.

Are these good things for society?

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Why don’t you take a step back and think about the two legal/moral theories you are celebrating.

1. A sitting president cannot be subpoenaed or indicted. They are above the law.

2. Presidents can’t be held legally accountable for lies that they propagate.

Are these good things for society?

Ask Obama as that is what he understood as well and therefore ignored the rule of law and had zero problem lying to the American people and media. Of course he learned from the best per the Clinton's and their machine.