Bombshell dropped on
'Russia, Russia, Russia' mantra
Why it's suddenly the last thing Democrats want to discuss
I guess this puts the whole Rice unmasking distraction to bed.
http://www.cnn.com/2017/09/13/politi...als/index.html
"But her explanation appears to have satisfied some influential Republicans on the committee, undercutting both Nunes and Trump and raising new questions about whether any Trump associates tried to arrange back-channel discussions with the Russians.
"I didn't hear anything to believe that she did anything illegal," Florida Rep. Tom Rooney, a Republican helping to lead the panel's Russia invesigation, told CNN of Rice's testimony. He declined to discuss any of the contents of her classified remarks."
Of course the klintons have engaged (and probably still are) in unethical and illegal activity. Yes, Krooked Killary arranged for US to sell uranium to the Ruskies. And in exchange for the great deal they got, the Ruskies "contributed" to the Klinton Foundation. These facts are not in dispute.
But the Klintons are made of Teflon and nothing will stick. That's because the libtards will not do anything to harm their own, so no way will the 'craps and the libtard media tell the truth or conduct any real investigations into them. They already know they are guilty. But, they are on the same team.
And, the DC Establishment, including McConnell and the other RINOs, won't do anything either because they are ALL wrapped up in it, and in activity such as the Klintons. If Killary and Slick Willy are "prosecuted" then there will be a whole lot of others who have their own skeletons also facing charges. So...they cover it up. It's one big happy party, all at the expense of the average American.
The Fake news is that there is zero Russian story at all except the crooked Clinton Foundation and the Hillary Uranium deal.
Everything else is a fake liberal news "Red Herring" to protect the Klinton's and the Dems that enabled them to rape America for decade for the sake of their private pocketbooks.
By Brooke SingmanPublished September 14, 2017
Newly disclosed emails expose fresh examples of "pay to play" at the Clinton State Department, a conservative watchdog group said Thursday.
The emails, from Clinton aide Huma Abedin's account, were among 1,600 documents turned over by the State Department in connection with Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act lawsuit.
Judicial Watch said the documents reveal Clinton Foundation friends requesting and receiving favors from the State Department.
“The emails show ‘what happened’ was that Hillary Clinton and Huma Abedin obviously violated laws about the handling of classified information and turned the State Department into a pay for play tool for the corrupt Clinton Foundation,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said, in a swipe at Clinton's newly released campaign memoir "What Happened." “The clear and mounting evidence of pay for play and mishandling of classified information warrant a serious criminal investigation by an independent Trump Justice Department.”
and now this one.
Trump rips Susan Rice on unmasking days after she spoke to House panel
'JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG'
EXECUTIVE
Trump rips Susan Rice on unmasking days after she spoke to House panel
Getting this thread back on track, Mueller just got a warrant for information about Trump ads on Facebook. Looks like Russia fronts paid for the ads but they were highly targeted to specific zip codes.
Also, Steve Bannon said a few days ago that Trump's decision to fire FBI Director Comey was the worst political blunder in decades.
"All roads lead to Putin" -- Thomas Jefferson
image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2017/09/Tru...ot-596x283.jpg
McCarthy: Something fishy about Obama officials' Manafort wiretapping denials
'They were saying they never targeted Trump himself for surveillance'
After months of current and former federal officials insisting there was no merit to allegations the government conducted surveillance on Donald Trump or his campaign during the 2016 cycle, there are now reports that former campaign manager Paul Manafort was being wiretapped.
After Trump tweeted his frustration at the Obama administration for green-lighting the alleged wiretapping, former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper rejected the assertion.
“For the part of the national security apparatus that I oversaw as DNI, there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president-elect as a candidate or against his campaign,” said Clapper on NBC’s “Meet the Press” back in March.
But CNN’s revelation that the government did procure a FISA warrant against Manafort and conduct surveillance on him in 2016 and 2017 brings such denials under the spotlight once again. Most importantly, did they lie?
Former federal prosecutor Andrew C. McCarthy told WND and Radio America the way Clapper and others carefully worded their denials earlier this year probably leaves them some wiggle room.
“I always thought that the denials, as indignant as they were by people connected to the Obama administration and even from the Justice Department after Trump took it over were always carefully couched and very narrow,” McCarthy said.
“What I took the denials to mean was that they were saying they never targeted Trump himself for surveillance and even more specifically that Obama did not do it,” he continued.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/#txZtg5c1CWEqXPkk.99