Comey's Firing

[Guisslapp]

Yep, under the headline saying:
"Sources: James Comey sought more resources for Russia investigation"

Sure seems like good journalism to me!



I seem to remember some facist making this comment to attack the media:

"Read Fox News, Drudge, Breitbart, and WND much? You should really explore the real news universe. "

Pitiful

You don't put the whole story in the headline.

And your reaction is the same as the studies predict for people that read/watch Fox News. You have a need to read news that reaffirms your closed minded viewpoints.

[Guisslapp]

No one who paid attention during the campaign should be surprised by the Trump regime. He's ruling exactly as he ran.

Yeah. Though he is more competent at attracting votes than he is at ruling,

[DawgyNWindow]

You don't put the whole story in the headline.

And your reaction is the same as the studies predict for people that read/watch Fox News. You have a need to read news that reaffirms your closed minded viewpoints.

Right back at ya.

Because of your closed-minded view of the world, you would not see that the unbiased factual headline should have read "Sources Differ on Comey's Request for Additional Resources", or something like that. The headline shows the bias, and you don't see it...sad.

But that would have sent the wrong signal, right?

[Guisslapp]

Right back at ya.

Because of your closed-minded view of the world, you would not see that the unbiased factual headline should have read "Sources Differ on Comey's Request for Additional Resources", or something like that. The headline shows the bias, and you don't see it...sad.

But that would have sent the wrong signal, right?

Statistics say you are more closeminded.

I primarily get my news from Reuters and CNN on occasion, which is proven to be far less biased than foxnews and MSNBC.

[FriscoDog]

https://twitter.com/KassyDillon/stat...p-literally%2F

Yeah.. CNN is doing some great investigative work... lol

[DawgyNWindow]

Statistics say you are more closeminded.

I primarily get my news from Reuters and CNN on occasion, which is proven to be far less biased than foxnews and MSNBC.

Yeah. You are just pure as the driven snow. You wake every day as a blank slate, with no preconceptions or beliefs at all, and read everything (but only from CNN and Reuters) as a disinterested observer and make an unbiased and totally logic-based judgement by the end of the day.

You think too much of yourself. You see the speck in everyone else's eye, but not the beam in your own. You are no more unbiased than anyone else, you just don't believe anyone is entitled to an opinion other than yours.

[Guisslapp]

https://twitter.com/KassyDillon/stat...p-literally%2F

Yeah.. CNN is doing some great investigative work... lol

A quirky headline to introduce you to the interview.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn...eam/index.html

[Guisslapp]

Yeah. You are just pure as the driven snow. You wake every day as a blank slate, with no preconceptions or beliefs at all, and read everything (but only from CNN and Reuters) as a disinterested observer and make an unbiased and totally logic-based judgement by the end of the day.

You think too much of yourself. You see the speck in everyone else's eye, but not the beam in your own. You are no more unbiased than anyone else, you just don't believe anyone is entitled to an opinion other than yours.

I have been wrong before and I will surely be wrong again. I remain open to constant revision.

From my own living experience, I know the conservative echo chamber is an unhealthy place to live.

[PawDawg]

From my own living experience, I know the conservative echo chamber is an unhealthy place to live.

As opposed to the liberal chamber that is always reasonable...filled with claims of Racism, Homophobia, and more free stuff.

[Guisslapp]

As opposed to the liberal chamber that is always reasonable...filled with claims of Racism, Homophobia, and more free stuff.

Don't have experience with that one, but statistics say it isn't as misinforming as the right wing echo chamber. I am not a liberal (just more liberal in some respects than you), but statistically liberals are more likely to venture outside of their safe space echo chambers because they don't have the same psychological need for re-affirmations.

[Guisslapp]

Statistically you right wingers are less likely to even read the article I posted breaking down the studies on the subject or,if you do, to entirely discount it since it doesn't come from your echo chamber.

[Soonerdawg]

Statistically you right wingers are less likely to even read the article I posted breaking down the studies on the subject or,if you do, to entirely discount it since it doesn't come from your echo chamber.

Cut and paste.

https://newrepublic.com/article/1199...watch-fox-news

[FriscoDawg]

Read Fox News, Drudge, Breitbart, and WND much? You should really explore the real news universe.

I pulled all of those of the top of my head from the era of Obama's "scandal-free" administration.

I'm the one who is in the real news universe. You are in DIMM land way past your eyeballs for someone falsely claiming to be independent.

[DONW]

I like what the acting FBI Director said today about opening the case back up on Hillary. I'd really like to see her foundation investigated. Might as well throw Benghazi in there, also. We still don't know who gave the stand down order that led to the death of 4 Americans. Obama and Comey can no longer protect her. How about Sheriff David Clark for FBI director!!!

[frogdog]

Statically speaking liberals believe in taking from me and giving to someone else whether they worked for it or not, are socialist and communist do not believe in capitalism or personal accountability (unless someone is eating to much sugar or smoking). There are plenty of countries that believe like that please move there and leave us our capitalism.