Originally Posted by
BhadDawg
I was visiting the CUSA board a few weeks ago and I noticed that some of the NT guys were talking about construction plans for a new IPF and Track and Field Complex. I thought NT was supposed to add baseball when they were able to, being able to finance those two projects sounds to me like they can afford Baseball. Am I wrong about this, or was this just a handshake and a wink deal where the conference and NT both knew they would never be forced to add Baseball. I cannot remember the deal when NT was added, but I do remember baseball being mentioned a lot. I don't know if it was mandatory for NT to add BB or not, if it was, would our Commissioner press the issue?
I am not wishing anything bad for NT, as a matter of fact, good for them if they were able to make a deal where it was their choice to add or not add BB. I would think them adding BB would also mean them adding another title nine sport too. I was just wondering why the conference was not pushing the addition of BB if NT has a contractual obligation to add it.
Speaking of our Conference Commissioner, She kind of reminds me of our OC, no one ever hears from her or even knows who she is. At least our previous CC was proactive and we heard from him every once and a while and the other conferences and TV networks knew who He/We were.
Moderators, maybe this belongs in conference talk, if so your welcome to move it.