|
|
Good looking crowd. I think part of the problem with USM is going to 14 bowl games in 17 years. Lost a lot of it's meaning.Originally Posted by HogDawg
Below is an Indy Bowl pic from LA Tech's 17-10 victory over Northern Illinois in 2008. The attendance was over 41K. What do you think?
Wanna trade?
Yep, and when losing 5 games per year like with Bower, it takes the luster of a bowl game win or lose. Football fans blame y'all firing Bower as a problem, but forget about Fedora, the great hire he was and the AD issues y'all had. It can jump up and bite anybody if they are not careful and IMO we are a sitting duck with our current AD. Six wins should be a wake up call for us, but many of our fans drink the kool aid that injuries caused our woes this year.
Florida State would have beaten any team, IMO. However, it is wrong for you to claim SMU GAVE 5 TOs. Tech FORCED the turnovers (I think it was 6) with good defense.
Monkey stomped? Is that worse than donkey stomped? Probably not. Now, Chimpanzee stomped! Whoa! Chimps are much bigger than little monkeys and very powerful.
The march of the "we are not worthy" USM fans is quite offensive. Look, it was USM that got their manhood kicked in yesterday, not "CUSA." If you buzzard fans are okay with considering yourselves so inferior to a 6-6 P5, fine for you. But it take it elsewhere. You got your asses kicked in the HoD Bowl too. We beat a P5 in the HoD Bowl.
118 College Drive. Hattiesburg, Ms 39406 (Fathers Day cards and gifts)
Sure you don't prefer gifts better suited for mommies?
"Kool Aid" --man, you sound like a guy who never played competitive--it ain't Kool aid when you get hurt and try to play-- you live in a fantasy world thinking groin pulls, concusions, hamstring do not reduce your ability and almost as important your ability to develop chemistry with team.
You would think you would at least THINK about how we performed in Bowl game when almost everyone back to full strength -- but of course your Kool aid philosophy is tough guys perform same when injured
Think about the games we lost when Trent and Carlos were hurt-- Dixon hurt-- Injuries are not excuses- they are a reality that exit -- You really do come across as someone who knows ZIP about impact of injuries .... oh well --nothing we at BBB in general can do will educate you about it--
Last edited by Dogsince65; 12-28-2017 at 02:21 PM. Reason: s
Speaking of bowls....
Navy 28 UVA 7 Halftime
UVA took the opening kickoff back for a TD, but it's been all Navy ever since. Last year, Henderson took the opening kickoff back about 75 yds and we scored a minute later. But, it wasn't all Navy after that.
If USM was playing UVA they'd get their asses kicked and tell the rest of us UVA would whip all of CUSA.
And wow! Navy has been wracked by injuries and is just 6-6. Not even a Top 25 team like they were last year.
Go Middies!
I could see how that could happen to us too. Also, let's not forget that we all get more excited when our team has 8, 9 or 10 wins, than we do when they have only 6 or 7.
That would be fine too. We are (according to our AD) a "diverse" University and athletic program. I assume that also means gender neutral.
Which games did we lose because we didn't have Carlos, Trent, or Dixon? Seriously which ones?
We didn't lose USM or UNT because of injuries. We lost because of coaching. For that matter we lost to South Carolina because of coaching.
I remember saying that the FG on the last play of the 1st half was going to cost us. I don't remember what set up the FG.
Navy 42 UVA 7 3rd qtr
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
