Keep dreaming. Reality is that more and more revelations about the corrupt DC deep state keep coming out every single day. The Democrat's ship is no longer simply taking on water, it's beginning to list, and will soon begin the sink. The question now is only one of how many, and exactly which prominent Dems will be going down with the USS Obama/Hillary when it takes its death plunge. Then a truly new day dawn on America, one where liberty is once again cherished and protected by those who serve us in DC.
Sometimes the substance reveals aspects of the sources/methods. In this case, the questions raised by the Nunes memo relate directly to the reliability of the sources and the methods by which the departments gained their intel. Thus, to rebut the insinuations of the memo in the most complete and compelling way, you would want to provide as much detail as possible (assuming the details supported your contention).
In the case of the Nunes memo, the “details” were not supportive of the conclusions he wanted his audience to make and that is why he omitted them.
Essentially, this is republicans taking advantage of classification rules to serve their own political purposes and control the narrative.
It was never about complete transparency, which should be patently clear now between the gaping holes in the Nunes memo, Nunes’ own admissions after the release of the memo, and Trump’s “about face” on the issue of transparency vs national security (remember he was going to 100% release the Nunes memo before he even had read it).
I am convinced we will see plenty come out from both perspectives that will spur more doubt in our leaders on both sides. I am all for it, whatever the outcome. Let’s see how they really do things and how crooked these people actually are.
Nunes took out any national security "details" on purpose. The Dem's memo didn't. What don't you understand? The "fix" was attempted by the deceitful Dems again but the "thinking" portion of our nation just isn't buying their lying BS anymore. Hence, very little play time traction in the news.
Just curious why the Grassley-Graham letter on the dossier isn't gaining more traction. Could it be that neither sides' narrative is particularly served by the contents?
https://www.politico.com/magazine/st...es-memo-216956
One memorandum by Mr. Steele that was not published by Buzzfeed is dated October19, 2016. The report alleges REDACTED, as well as REDACTED. Mr. Steele's memorandum states that his company "received this report from REDACTED US State Department," that the report was the second in a series, and that the report wasinformation that came from a foreign sub-source who "is in touch with REDACTED, a contactof REDACTED, a friend of the Clintons, who passed it to REDACTED." It is troubling enoughthat the Clinton Campaign funded Mr. Steele's work, but that these Clinton associates werecontemporaneously feeding Mr. Steele allegations raises additional concerns about hiscredibility.