Another FBI and/or Obama "Deep State" screw-up?

[TYLERTECHSAS]

How about stop making vaguely generalized statements and explain what you think the problem is and how to solve it?

I have on the immigration thread. You might have missed it the last week or so. Not sure how the immigration issue ended up on here.

I guess this started it.

What are you talking about? Current events keep proving my concerns.

[Guisslapp]

You know the answer and laws as you do this for fun (Your politico work on immigration) . Play with somebody else.

You need to study up on those laws because I don’t think you understand them.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

You need to study up on those laws because I don’t think you understand them.

You're the lawyer, and the rest of the Dem. lawyers , who should have known the legalities, loopholes and issues of our failed immigration system. Not me! And your profession needs to get it right..... NOW!! Protect America and our citizens and quit worrying and spending $$ letting the entire world illegally across our borders at this point in history.
The power to get extra votes has socialist liberal Dems drunk on it's evil wine.
They have to enter legally PERIOD!!


Back to the thread title.

Scum FBI traitors

FBI counterspies under fire after disclosures of politicization...

Congress investigating agents for evidence tampering in Russia case...

[TYLERTECHSAS]

You knew it was coming.

Judicial Watch: What about Mueller aide's bias?

Lawsuit demands communications of Hillary donor Andrew Weissmann


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/#3dSkQpJjAuVcjieR.99

image: http://www.wnd.com/files/2018/05/mueller-594x283.jpg

[TYLERTECHSAS]

The moment of truth coming soon.

KIM STRASSEL: We may soon find out if FBI has been lying to America

• House will take ‘other measures’ if DOJ, FBI fail to comply with subpoena request, Nunes says

MOMENT OF TRUTH

[dawg80]

The DNC is still refusing to allow forensic inspection of those servers, allegedly hacked by the Russians. The point was made by an expert that it is a very, very simple matter to determine the origin of hacks. Seems to me the 'craps would have gladly turned over those puters to someone....the FBI, maybe...long ago, if what they claim to be true, is indeed true.

But then the same thing can be said of the FBI and DOJ as well. Why the resistance (note that term) to getting to the truth and proclaiming said truth to the world? If I didn't know better....ahem....I'd say they all have something to hide.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

the dnc is still refusing to allow forensic inspection of those servers, allegedly hacked by the russians. The point was made by an expert that it is a very, very simple matter to determine the origin of hacks. Seems to me the 'craps would have gladly turned over those puters to someone....the fbi, maybe...long ago, if what they claim to be true, is indeed true.

But then the same thing can be said of the fbi and doj as well. Why the resistance (note that term) to getting to the truth and proclaiming said truth to the world? If i didn't know better....ahem....i'd say they all have something to hide.

Deep State with it's tangled woven web!!!

[Guisslapp]

The DNC is still refusing to allow forensic inspection of those servers, allegedly hacked by the Russians. The point was made by an expert that it is a very, very simple matter to determine the origin of hacks. Seems to me the 'craps would have gladly turned over those puters to someone....the FBI, maybe...long ago, if what they claim to be true, is indeed true.

But then the same thing can be said of the FBI and DOJ as well. Why the resistance (note that term) to getting to the truth and proclaiming said truth to the world? If I didn't know better....ahem....I'd say they all have something to hide.

Source for this fake news?

[DawgyNWindow]

Source for this fake news?

From everything I've seen, the server was never turned over to the FBI for analysis, and any reports generated by the FBI concerning the server were all based on a third party report saying the server had been hacked. I highly doubt this is common procedure for the FBI for supposed national security issues (so yes, I question the findings).

Besides, Comey himself said the FBI attempted to gain access to the server for determining whether it had been hacked, and he was rebuffed by the DNC. Thus, the FBI was never allowed to analyze the server themselves. And since Comey is the dem "pure as the driven snow choirboy" again and incapable of telling a falsehood (bad ole Trump), I highly doubt you will question the veracity of his testimony.

[techman05]

Logical deduction from an examination of the chain of events.

[Guisslapp]

Did the FBI ask for the server?

[Guisslapp]

But let’s keep it real - if the FBI did the assessment rather than a third party, you guys wouldn’t put any more stock in it since you say the FBI is part of the deep state. In that sense, a third party makes the investigation have more credibility. Regarldess the IC assessment of Russian hacking is not based mostly on the third party assessment - but is corroborated by other intelligence intercepts and upstream data collection. Remember, the IC warned the DNC that they were being hacked even without direct access to the DNC server.

[DawgyNWindow]

Did the FBI ask for the server?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fbi-director-comey-agency-requested-access-to-dnc-servers/

I have to add.....I don't think you can really trust anything Comey says. He lives in a completely Comey-centric world where he is near godlike in his pursuit of truth, justice and the American way. He embellishes everyting to show himself in a better light, somehow above it all and uber competent in every way.

So consider the source when you consider his testimony.

[dawg80]

But let’s keep it real - if the FBI did the assessment rather than a third party, you guys wouldn’t put any more stock in it since you say the FBI is part of the deep state. In that sense, a third party makes the investigation have more credibility. Regarldess the IC assessment of Russian hacking is not based mostly on the third party assessment - but is corroborated by other intelligence intercepts and upstream data collection. Remember, the IC warned the DNC that they were being hacked even without direct access to the DNC server.

Yes. And the point made by the fellow on "Fake News," as you would erroneously refer to Fox, was simply that the DNC has flatly refused to allow forensic inspection of their servers. If they were hacked by the Russians, and if Donald Trump was involved in said hacking, as some of you loons allege, then maybe there is proof to be found on their servers. At the very least, according to this expert, it would be a relatively simple matter to trace back any and all accesses to those servers. Including Russian hacks! Since the DNC are all democraps, who we all know NEVER do anything wrong, then obviously the DNC would be victims in all of this.

I don't understand why these victims wouldn't want the bad hackers nailed.

[TYLERTECHSAS]

Did the FBI ask for the server?

Don't believe they asked for any Hillary or DNC server.


Trump: Why didn't DNC hand over hacked server to FBI? | TheHill

thehill.com/homenews/.../388507-trump-why-didnt-dnc-hand-over-hacked-server-to-...

May 20, 2018 - All Contributors ... Dem congressional candidate apologizes after he was caught taking ... Comey said at the time that the FBI and DNC agreed to let a private firm ... left his firm last year, asking why he hasn't “been charged and arrested.” ... Podesta, whose brother, John Podesta, led Hillary Clinton · Hillary ...

FBI Says the Democratic Party Wouldn't Let Agents See the Hacked ...

https://www.wired.com/.../fbi-says-d...s-see-hacked-e...

Jan 5, 2017 - According to the FBI official, "This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third ... to the investigation says FBI didn't need the DNC servers because it already had ... The FBI official's characterization that the DNC "caused significant delays ... FBI warning that the DNC was first motivated to defend its network.