And you got pissed off when they were kneeling...Originally Posted by PawDawg
|
|
|
|
|
And you got pissed off when they were kneeling...
So you acknowledge that Twitter is a publisher. Thanks for clarifying.
Being apathetic is not “pissed off”
Is BB&B a publisher?
Well...at least these libtard thugs going wild in Minnysoda….a good lib blue state...is offering a distraction from the C-19 virus hoax. As always, I seek the silver lining in everything.
Poor ole bone spur Don got his feelings hurt!
Time is your friend. Impulse is your enemy. -John Bogle
Twitter has flagged a tweet from President Donald Trump in which he threatens Minneapolis rioters: “When the looting starts, the shooting starts.”
Trump is gonna regret starting this battle. If Twitter loses 230 protection then they have to moderate even more. Bad news for someone that relies on the medium to get a false narrative out.
He doesn't need it.
He has Russia helping him get his false narrative out on FB remember?
So far FB seems far less concerned about policing their content. But if his EO prevails, they will have to get more serious about it.
I would say over 90% of voters have already made up their minds for the November election. As for the remaining 10% or so, they will break close to 50-50, with the key being where, in which states, the vote swings. It won't matter, for instance, if 100% of the undecideds choose Biden in California, no way does Trump stand a chance there anyway. Especially if it is truly close, then the Dems will magically find thousands of votes in the trunks of cars...all votes for Biden! So, the national polls don't matter. It's the swing state numbers that count.
As for Twitter...well, while it is anecdotal and obviously a very limited sample, I am seeing push-back against Twitter from folks who are definitely NOT Trump-supporters. One just posted this morning he can decide for himself what to believe and as he said, he judges Trump like he judges ALL politicians, on their accomplishments, not what they say (or tweet). He and others point out the slippery slope Twitter has chosen. I don't think this Twitter issue will matter one bit come election day, but if it does, it might push a few indies toward Trump as show of defiance toward the big, manipulating corporation that is Twitter.
You're the lawyer, you tell me. Does it meet the Section 230 definition of an interactive computer service? If so, does it attempt to exercise editorial control over the content beyond what is considered obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harrassing, or otherwise objectionable? If the answer to those two questions is yes, then it would seem to me that it meets the definition of a publisher.
The left's plan of destruction through the China Virus is not a given.
Why would he regret it? It's pretty obvious that he wants to bring this to a head, and it's about time. The social media companies want to have their cake and eat it too.
I'm fine with them having complete editorial control over any and all content, but you can't have immunity from legal liability at the same time.
As ususal you have missed the main point. You just can't grasp the big picture, that's why you're Johnny Lightweight.
Trump wants to bring this issue to a head. if social media are going to exercise editorial bias in how they filter content they are a publisher and cannot have immunity from legal liability.
BTW, does anyone know what George Floyd did to be arrested? I have purposely not followed this story too closely because it is just a rerun of others. But, just curious how he and the cops came to be together in the first place.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
