Originally Posted by
dawg80
Not having Dancy certainly didn't help the running game. But Tucker stepped up and did a good job.
I think we have a good-enough OL to develop a solid running attack. It's the scheme, and the fact opposing defenses know Smith is no running threat. They don't have to account for our QB, they don't have to assign a spy to watch him and that is HUGE! Means they can scheme to defend with 11, not just 10.
Our running plays are all too vanilla and easy to defend. Actually, so is our passing attack. I know I could destroy Tech's offense if I were a DC. Crush it. The Dawgs would be hard-pressed to even cross midfield on a drive. So, you may ask, then why don't we see that from other DCs? It's because they don't have the luxury of knowing Tech's offense like I do. They have to scheme/plan for 12 opponents each year, in rapid succession week to week, and can't really study Tech's offense in that much detail. Then, of course, sometimes the defense does everything right and an offense can still make plays.
Anyway, what is clear is this. If Tech were to magically trot out a good QB, I mean an actual GOOD QB, this team would take off like a Saturn rocket...well, with one caveat, we still have a weak WR corps. But, I think that can be overcome with a very good QB.