Haha...their master evil plan? Count legally cast ballots.Originally Posted by glm47
|
|
|
|
|
Haha...their master evil plan? Count legally cast ballots.
Legally cast ballots is such a relative term with the democrats and RINOs.
It's not the casting of ballots that is in question. It's the counting of those ballots. Try to focus on polling stats instead of real numbers.
The point is, are they legal? Arguments are that in many many 1000s of cases the ballots are not legal nor were they counted legally. You can’t jump to the end without working through the middle.
You wish.
And you wish, not. A brilliantly hollow point.
The person arguing that the votes were illegal or counted improperly really should have some evidence for that.
No good arguments say that. No evidence, just a whiner trying to make himself feel better by casting doubt about n a result that makes him look bad.
They're trying to subvert it with the "National Popular Vote Interstate Compact" that says regardless of the actual result of the state, the electoral college votes will go to the candidate with the most votes nationwide.
Right now, 16 states consisting of 196 electoral votes have made the pact. 4 states consisting of a further 60 electoral votes are pending in some form. 18 other states have it cooking. So far, none of the 16 have acted on it because the pact requires having the 270.
as someone who wishes both candidates could lose, that early-morning biden bump does look pretty fishy. not saying it's illegitimate, but i hope they did a good job of keeping things transparent and well-documented.
also, the subversion of the electoral college is a terrible idea. campaigns are built around winning the electoral vote, and the electoral college reality influences voters. for example, how many republicans stay home in california and new york because they know their vote is useless? if you want to change it to popular vote, change it with an amendment, but don't pretend the popular vote in any given election is indicative of what it would be if that were the way the election was decided.
You really need to practice your reading comprehension skills. First, re-read what I wrote. I asked a question and pointed out what’s taking place. I didn’t draw a conclusion and for sure wasn’t whining about anything. For someone that I see post a lot on here I really thought you would’ve been more astute than what you just showed.
If all they are doing in Philly is "counting legally cast votes" then why have they denied GOP poll watchers from the process? (we all know why...)
Stupid-ass protestors are burning American flags in NY and Philly and chanting "count all votes," and in Detroit, because Michigan has been declared for Harris-Biden, protestors are chanting "stop the count!" LOL! Nothing hypocritical there, eh.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thehill...ng-sites%3famp
Your “question” assumed facts not in evidence.
That would be an inference, not an assumption. You guys do that a lot.
https://www.oginski-law.com/faqs/wha...nce--mean-.cfm
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
