Hell, Trump appointed one of their anchors as the Director of the National Economic Council.
It is literally THE channel you watch if you are a capitalist or sit in a C suite. The only alternative is Bloomberg. CNBC gets all the CEO interviews and reports all the breaking economic news the fastest.
Liberals aren’t usually interested in keeping up with the latest bond auctions or market-moving corporate news.
You intentionally left out the best source https://www.google.com/search?q=fox+...EESpJ1mSnvc-M:
Because I have credibility and I want to keep it, I have to agree with Goosey on this. There is one liberal dude, Andrew Sorkin, and a couple who are mostly middle-of-the-road with an ever slight (and I mean SLIGHT) lean to the left, but there is also a devout conservative, Joe Kernen, and a few who lean to the right, so overall the network is balanced. BUT! 90%+ of the time one's political leaning has nothing to do with it, as they are all focused on the stock market, and other markets, like the Chicago commodity market, and of course general economic news.
I have seen both Sorkin and Kernen report on market/economic news and neither put any political spin on it. BUT!! those two did just have a heated exchange on the show...
https://www.adweek.com/tvnewser/squawk-box-co-hosts-andrew-ross-sorkin-joe-kernen-address-yesterdays-intense-on-air-argument/442489/
It actually made me cringe, because it is a departure from what you usually see on the network.
I get annoyed when they bring up politics, and it is usually Kernen that invokes it. There are plenty of channels you can watch if you want to hear politics. That is not what CNBC is for.
And I have seen Sorkin invoke it too. I have to admit, I would like to punch Sorkin in the nose. Just one good "pow!" I sometimes switch channels when he is on and is talking too much.