The Clinton dude is wrong. HRC worked Trump over on the facts in 2016 debates, but that doesn’t matter to low information voters.Originally Posted by dawg80
The debates will be a circus, and the clown always has the advantage there.
|
|
|
|
|
The Clinton dude is wrong. HRC worked Trump over on the facts in 2016 debates, but that doesn’t matter to low information voters.
The debates will be a circus, and the clown always has the advantage there.
Lame excuses! Never mind, I know the REAL truth.
Chicken shit!!!!!!!!!!! Bawahh! LOL at you...and Creepy, sleepy Joe!
1. Man, the anchor has really moved on "liberal" hasn't it?
2. I do think there should probably be debates. Just because it's the norm and expected. I wouldn't watch a Biden/Trump debate for $100 personally. But it seems at least some expectation is there.
3. I also agree that at this point it's probably kind of a waste of time. Trump's biggest fans will back him literally no matter how he comes off in a debate. And it's hard to think of what he could say to win over the other side. I guess there would be a slim chance that some of the "lesser of two evil" voters who held their nose the last time could get that final straw to back off (and vote the other way, third candidate, or sit this one out). But again, at this point, don't we know who he is? Best guess is both sides declare victory and pull some sound-bytes and the end result changes virtually no actual votes.
4. I know you're being sarcastic, but I'll ask anyway - as a Trump supporter, do you really think he helps his chances for re-election by speaking in public? I tend to disagree with the content of what he says, but even when I happen to agree with him - hearing him speak. . .doesn't inspire confidence in me. Do you really find that he comes across as inspiring, intelligent, or at all competent when you hear him speak? Maybe it's just my southern prejudice towards his accent (or again, my frequent disagreement with his points or skepticism on his facts) but even pre-presidential run I never heard Donald Trump speak and thought he was doing himself any favors - but again, clearly others disagree (or do they - at least some of his support is in spite of what he says rather than because of it, right?).
5. So again - sarcasm aside - as a Trump supporter, you really want to see him in a debate? Do you think that's something he's good at? And good enough to swing votes his way? Or stir up his base by "owning the libs so hard" in a debate? Is that your wish? Seriously asking.
This is easy it is not even close, the Democrats have moved so far left that they are Marxist in policy. Anyone that does not believe that is just not paying attention. If you truly believe America and it’s economy is not the best in the world then vote for the Marxist, but at least be honest about it and declare that you are in favor of Marxism.
The BIG question is this: why is Biden, and his handlers, running for cover on the subject of debates, and why is Trump and his campaign clamoring for more than the just the original three?
If I were a neutral party I would say Biden is afraid and has something to hide. I also think that's what a good portion of that undecided vote, maybe 10% of the electorate, will think as well.
Flashback to 2012...remember Romney smoked obummer in Debate #1. Really hammered him hard and temporarily turned the polls, the election, on its head. Of course being the candy-azz he is, Romney let obummer up off the mat, and then obummer turned the tables on him the remaining debates. Had Romney had any balls, and wasn't afraid to be branded as a racist for "attacking the black guy," he could have finished obummer off at the end of Debate 1 and then in Debate 2. But, he backed off, and that was all obummer needed to regain the edge. So, don't tell me the debates don't matter.
I also think Trump drilled Krooked Killary in the debates. He had least pushed himself into the arena where he had a chance. He seized the momentum and after the first debate, undecideds and even Killary-leaners, started listening to what he had to say.
Killary tried to play defense...you know that old, tried and untrue, prevent defense and ride what she thought was a safe lead in the polls. Wrong!
So. . . yes, then?
As a Trump supporter you think a public debate helps his election chances and hurts Biden's election chances? I don't have an agenda (here) or even any more follow up questions (I imagine this thread will continue down the usual path and I'll unsubscribe shortly).
Just curious. I would have thought the opposite in general.
I think those that pay no attention to what is going on in the world - those that watch fake news will have an opportunity to watch Biden in action. It is quite interesting to see him and anyone that watched Weekend at Bernie's will think of it during the debate. He is clearly clueless, and Trump will eat his lunch. Will that help Trump I think it will. Those that don't care are more likely to stay home.
So. . . yes, then?
As a Trump supporter you think a public debate helps his election chances and hurts Biden's election chances? I don't have an agenda (here) or even any more follow up questions (I imagine this thread will continue down the usual path and I'll unsubscribe shortly).
Just curious. I would have thought the opposite in general.
What makes you think I am a Trump supporter?
CNN's April Ryan 'cannot wait' to see 'armed forces' pull Trump out of the White House
quote:
“There’s going to be a split-screen on Jan. 20, 2021. If Joe Biden is now going to be the 46th president of the United States, you will have him being inaugurated and watching police and armed forces trying to pull Donald Trump out of the White House. I cannot wait for that split-screen,” Ryan said.quote:This is absolutely hilarious considering it is the Democratic Party who has refused to except the results of the 2016 election and have been doing everything they possibly can to overturn the election.
Hillary Clinton, Rep. Maxine Waters, D-Calif., and Rep. James Clyburn, D-S.C., have also recently expressed concern that Trump will refuse to leave the White House if he loses the election, with many prominent liberals claiming Trump’s rhetoric dismissing mail-in ballots is the foundation for the theory.
I mean, what? The post below for a start. And. . .the post I was responding to initially. And most of what you've said in this forum over the last 4 years. I mean, if not. . . I guess the same question applies?
Whether a Trump supporter or not, I'm curious as to whether you see him engaging in public debate as helpful for his re-election hopes? His debate skills are a plus in this election? Do you really think that's the case? I won't argue if you do, but I'm truly wondering if that's something you think (or others who would like to chime in, particularly those who support him).
I'm sorry, inudesu, but you have me confused with someone who has an interest in politics. I don't dwell on such matters.
Got to live this one. Yes our resident regressives love a good commie for President. China, Cuba and Russia want Biden to win as well. Must make y’all proud to be a Regressive Democrat.
Communist Party leader Bob Avakian has announced his support for former Vice President Joe Biden in the upcoming presidential election.
Avakian, the founder and leader of the Revolutionary Communist Party USA, told his followers in a statement on Saturday that they should vote for Joe Biden in the 2020 presidential election.
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...ses-joe-biden/
But, I did some quick research on the topic...I would have to say, yes, Trump would crush Biden in the debates. There are lots of pundits who share that view. Biden's own people, and those supporting him, are encouraging him to avoid the debates. That speaks volumes.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
