What would need to be redacted?Originally Posted by detltu
|
|
|
|
|
What would need to be redacted?
Rosenstein wrote a letter to Trump recommending firing Comey.
I finally found someone on Greasy's level:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hamilton_Burger
If only Trump could have stuck with the rationale provided in that letter. Instead, he offered a couple other reasons including “that Russia thing”.
Pure speculation on your part, let's see it all:
All of the memoranda relevant to the opening of the investigation.
All of the testimony at the closed hearings.
All of the FISA warrant applications.
All of Rosenstein's scope memo.
Then we will know why this investigation started and who was behind it. I already know and so do you, but your hatred of Trump has clouded your thinking.
The last 2 days have been very bad for for liberals and their fake news. Just like Trump said all along, there was no Russia collusion and Michael Avanatti is going to go to prison for a VERY long time for trying to extort 22 million from Nike. Avanatti was on MSNBC and CNN 3-4 times a day for a while while he was the porn star's lawyer. Throw in the 275 million lawsuit against CNN and it's been a very bad month. Fake news will only get you so far.
Which is why we need to see the Mueller report.
Without seeing the report I don't know, but the standard items are:
1. Anything related to an ongoing investigation
2. Anything that would harm national security.
3. Any classified information
4. Any sensitive information
Typically they redact more than they need to, and I suspect that's where the battle will go next. Haven't we already been through this a while back. Was that the congressional Russian collusion investigation that we had the fight over redaction?
Will former CIA Director be held accountable for lying? https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...ed-with-russia
Grand Jury testimony and national security discussions. I realize Hillary didn't care, but it is illegal to release such information. Of course you know that.
You and the libs need more talking points. Even if they are lies they say them over and over and over. Kind of like saying Trump committed collusion.
He deserves to face a firing squad.
Adam Schiff, American hero, pants and then repeatedly spanks the entire GOP. That will leave a mark!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wlWyGOvFwSo
Do you mean this Adam Schiff that's looking for that photo of naked Trump.? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2pc1STVd0po
The same.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wlWyGOvFwSo
I thought Schiff was going to break down and start crying. He just can't take it that after 22 months of investigating, Mueller found no collusion between between any member of the Republican party and the Russians. He also missed one very important point, the lady Russian lawyer met immediately after she left the meeting with Fusion GPS lawyers who were working for the DNC and Hillary Clinton.. Denial is not working good for Schiff at this point. He needs to step down as the chairman. I guess he forgot about when he complained about Nunes stepping down which Nunes actually did. Schiff should do the same.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote