Enough is enough. More distractions is all it would accomplish, which is the intent obviously. The dems (under Obama's watch and at his behest) made a calculated risk and seem to have lost. They were trying to set up a no lose situation for themselves. Continue the behavior and they will lose more I believe. It is devious to say the least. I am not enamored with Trump but he is our duly elected President, which is unacceptable to the dems.
Chinese collusion courtesy of Joe Biden on behalf of Hunter Biden, and the Bank of China. Dirty deal! COLLUSION!
Calling it now! Should be a deal breaker for Biden's run at the WH. And would be, if he were an (R). But, he's a (D), so never mind. He's allowed to do dirty deals as a (D).
Carry on!
Six more years baby!! This is what the liberal Dems and commie media get for living the lies 24/7.
President cracks term limit joke after big win...
GOODWIN: TRUMP LIBERATED...
'TOTAL BULLSH*T'...
GREENWALD: CONSPIRACY THEORIES, 'BOMBSHELLS' OBLITERATED...
MEDIA MELTDOWN
And of course there was this one.
Obama in 2016: No one could 'rig' elections
'There's no evidence'
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/#x6JUbhh8fjdOS3Py.99
The report actually proved that the media wasn’t lying. It was Trump and Huckabee-Sanders that were proven to be liars.
Not the whole report no. I have better things to do than read a 400+ page document. However apparently you haven't either..
Page 95 Section 3. Carter Page:
However, the investigation did not establish that Page coordinated with the Russian government in its efforts to interfere with the 2016 presidential election.
Mueller report's release was a model of transparency
By Deroy Murdock
Under federal law, Attorney General William Barr could have taken Special Counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s long-awaited Russiagate report, shoved it in a drawer, and sent the following letter to Capitol Hill:
“Dear Congress:
“No collusion. No obstruction.
“Love,
“Bill”
Beyond that, Barr was obligated to do none of what he did on Thursday morning. He held a press conference at Justice Department headquarters, answered journalists’ questions, sent Congress redacted copies of Mueller’s 448-page “Report On The Investigation Into Russian Interference in the 2016 Presidential Election” (on CD-ROMs), made a nearly unredacted copy (minus only legally verboten grand jury material) available for top congressional leaders to inspect, posted the document on DOJ’s public website, and freed Mueller to discuss his findings before Congress, as Democrats have demanded. Barr previously agreed to let the Senate and House judiciary committees grill him on, respectively, May 1 and 2.
Democrats have suggested that Barr has something to hide. As House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York stated Wednesday, “The American people deserve to hear the truth.” In fact, Barr’s behavior has been clearer than a Brooks Brothers storefront window.
The White House has been equally see-through. While President Donald J. Trump ground his molars through this 22-month-long legal root canal, he let his lawyers hand Mueller some 1.4 million pages of records and allowed administration and campaign personnel to be interrogated. Trump never asserted executive privilege, nor did he request redactions in the report.
MORE
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/murdock-mueller-report
According to Carter Page, neither Mueller nor his angry democrat harassers, talked to Page. They tapped his phones trying to get dirt on Trump talking to him. This will all come out in Horowitz report. Now that Trump has a real AG, the democrats can forget about getting his tax files. If Barr had been the AG from the start, the witch hunt would never have happened.
For spying on a political opponent? That should be a very tall bar. They certainly laid out the probably cause for spying on a foreign official. I don't think they even met the bar for spying on an American citizen. IMO. I think they opened a can of worms. You don't think people in the Clinton campaign had some conflicts or troubling contact with hostile foreign governments? I think if this is acceptable they can find a reason to spy on any campaign they want to going forward. It wouldn't shock me a bit if Trump used this power on his opponents going forward or the next Pres or the next.