+ Reply to Thread
Page 42 of 83 FirstFirst ... 32404142434452 ... LastLast
Results 616 to 630 of 1233

Thread: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

  1. #616
    Champ dawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond repute dawg80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    31,586

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    BTW the GAO is "employed" by Congress and always sides with it. The GAO also found obummer "violated the law" several times during his tenure, but nothing ever came of it.

    Next!

  2. #617
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    23,095

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Quote Originally Posted by dawg80 View Post
    BTW the GAO is "employed" by Congress and always sides with it. The GAO also found obummer "violated the law" several times during his tenure, but nothing ever came of it.

    Next!
    Remember how one of the defenses that Republicans have been raising is that “you haven’t even shown that Trump violated a law”?

    That defense was never true to begin with, because the Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and violation of your oath of abusing your power to self-deal would violate the Constitution.

    The other defense - that Trump was doing his job to “stamp out corruption”, has also been further destroyed since the House hearings as more evidence has come to light.

    For example, why was Giuliani representing Trump personally in the discussions with Zelensky (rather than the US)? Again, we already knew that this was “a domestic political errand” but the new evidence that has been made public, including what Parnas has been saying, has only supported what our distinguished civil servants have been saying.

  3. #618
    Champ dawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond repute dawg80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    31,586

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Your TDS is showing.

  4. #619
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    23,095

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Quote Originally Posted by techman05 View Post
    I am absolutely serious. You either have rules or you don’t.
    To be clear, Obama not sending javelins to Ukraine was not a violation of the law. He didn’t have to. And, more importantly, his decision not to send it was based on his calculation (as wrong as it might have been) that sending weapons would escalate the situation. He wasn’t withholding it to get a personal favor.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nyt...raine.amp.html

  5. #620
    Champ techman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ruston
    Posts
    12,486

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Quote Originally Posted by Guisslapp View Post
    To be clear, Obama not sending javelins to Ukraine was not a violation of the law. He didn’t have to. And, more importantly, his decision not to send it was based on his calculation (as wrong as it might have been) that sending weapons would escalate the situation. He wasn’t withholding it to get a personal favor.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nyt...raine.amp.html
    It’s not even just this one issue. Every political leader feels invincible because it doesn’t matter how they conduct themselves, no one gets punished. Other than one half thinking you are a no good so and so, there is no backlash. That’s why Trump is doing things the way he is. He is smart enough to see everyone around him getting away with lying, cheating, and anything else. Not saying he is right for his mob boss mentality, but it’s pretty consistent with political figures. This will never change so long as we have 2 parties more concerned with public perception and re-election than the good of the people.

  6. #621
    Champ TYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    49,573

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Quote Originally Posted by Guisslapp View Post
    To be clear, Obama not sending javelins to Ukraine was not a violation of the law. He didn’t have to. And, more importantly, his decision not to send it was based on his calculation (as wrong as it might have been) that sending weapons would escalate the situation. He wasn’t withholding it to get a personal favor.

    https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nyt...raine.amp.html
    Obama didn't want Biden caught via his own bribery of the Ukraine officials.
    Remember in Biden's bribery video, Biden said firmly stated, "Call the President" and he will stand behind what I said.

  7. #622
    Champ TYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    49,573

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    So true!

    Pelosi overturns American justice system with new standard for convictions

    'It's not a question of proof'

    Published January 17, 2020 at 1:03pm

    Last fall, Barack Obama CIA Director John Brennan announced a new legal standard for American jurisprudence.

    He said Americans are innocent until they are accused of a crime.
    Now, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has posed another new standard.
    It's not about "proof" anymore.
    It's about "allegations."
    See her remarks:


    "It's not a question of proof, it says what allegations have been made and that has to be subjected to scrutiny as to how we go forward, but it should not be ignored in the context of other events that could substantiate some of that," Pelosi told reporters Thursday.
    Brennan, on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" last October, said "people are innocent, you know, until alleged to be involved in some kind of criminal activity."

    Watch the video


    Zerohedge featured journalist Glenn Greenwald's Twitter post on Brennan's statement.
    Greenwald wrote, "With sincere apologies in advance to all U.S. liberals who are offended by criticisms of former CIA chiefs, @JohnBrennan's understanding of the presumption of innocence is completely warped, but in the most unsurprising way imaginable."
    Zerohedge explained: "The presumption of innocence, as a foundation of the U.S. judicial system, has seemingly been under attack since November 8th 2016. An allegation is made, media runs with the narrative, the seed of possibility of guilt is implanted in the minds of zombie Americans, and the accused is maligned forever – no court required. Simple. And now, none other than former CIA Director John Brennan clarifies exactly how the deep state sees 'due process'…"
    Brennan, now a CNN commentator, also has accused Trump of treason.

    https://www.wnd.com/2020/01/pelosi-o...d-convictions/

  8. #623
    Champ techman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond reputetechman05 has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Ruston
    Posts
    12,486

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    I allegedly have $30million coming my way. So, when do I pick up my check?

  9. #624
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    23,095

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Republicans are probably shocked this weekend to learn how deeply Nunes was connected to Lev Parnas’s efforts to serve Trump’s personal interests in Ukraine.

    Drain the swamp of these people that are more concerned about their party loyalties than the interests of America.

  10. #625
    Champ dawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond reputedawg80 has a reputation beyond repute dawg80's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    31,586

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Quote Originally Posted by Guisslapp View Post

    Drain the swamp of these people that are more concerned about their party loyalties than the interests of America.
    Agreed! vote all democraps out of office! they have made a mockery of the Constitution, hell bent on personal vendettas instead of caring about our nation.

  11. #626
    Super Moderator PawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond reputePawDawg has a reputation beyond repute PawDawg's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    50,878

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Quote Originally Posted by Guisslapp View Post
    Republicans are probably shocked this weekend to learn how deeply Nunes was connected to Lev Parnas’s efforts to serve Trump’s personal interests in Ukraine.

    Drain the swamp of these people that are more concerned about their party loyalties than the interests of America.
    We've been knowing this "Lev Parnas" crap was coming since back in November. No surprises from the dead beat left and your heros of the drive by media.
    "eye fo an eye and toof fo a toof" - Idiot in Missouri

  12. #627
    Champ TYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    49,573

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Quote Originally Posted by PawDawg View Post
    We've been knowing this "Lev Parnas" crap was coming since back in November. No surprises from the dead beat left and your heros of the drive by media.
    And the leaders of Ukraine stated this week that this Lev Parnas is a huge liar and not to be believed. Of course Guisslapp won’t see this on his CNN or liberal rags and bloggers pages.

  13. #628
    Champ DawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond reputeDawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond reputeDawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond reputeDawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond reputeDawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond reputeDawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond reputeDawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond reputeDawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond reputeDawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond reputeDawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond reputeDawgyNWindow has a reputation beyond repute DawgyNWindow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Middle Tennessee
    Posts
    3,505

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Lev has no first hand knowledge of anything, but he was seen holding a red solo cup while standing by a punchbowl in the hallway upstairs at a party. That's enough for the dems.

  14. #629
    Dawg Adamant Argument Czar Guisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond reputeGuisslapp has a reputation beyond repute Guisslapp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    In your mind and under your skin
    Posts
    23,095

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Trump’s loner attorney making the exact opposite constitutional argument against Clinton in 1998. Lol

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gpXr-sfwaDk

  15. #630
    Champ TYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond reputeTYLERTECHSAS has a reputation beyond repute
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    49,573

    Re: Why no Trump impeachment thread on Paw-Litics???

    Quote Originally Posted by Guisslapp View Post
    Trump’s loner attorney making the exact opposite constitutional argument against Clinton in 1998. Lol

    https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=gpXr-sfwaDk
    Dang, he must have switch parties to a socialist Democrat. They are Kings of the Big Double Standard.

+ Reply to Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts