Originally Posted by
tenacious_dog
I have wrestled with how to respond to the posters who don't like what's being done with the baseball field. Many recent comments have kind of laid me low. But what I write in response ends up being too long. So I end up with this:
Most (all?) of you guys probably don't have enough facts to make the statements you've made. But make the accusations and demeaning comments you have. Maybe I'm wrong, but I'm not going to be surprised if down the road you learn something about the processes and projects where you end up saying, "Oh, I didn't know "that" when I made this or that comment."
What is the appeal of running a situation down when, for crying out loud, we're getting tremendous facilities for about 50 cents on the dollar? People like Adam McGuirt have lived with this for months to come up with the best facilities possible. But you can't trust them to have an adequate brain in their collective heads to weigh the trade-offs and make the best choices? Do you seriously believe stadium seating didn't get painstakingly evaluated? Is posting a "knowledgeable" comment that important?
I'm taking a break until after the baseball stadium is open.
Tenacious