Also, if the 60-70 year old patients with underlying conditions who I know personally were going to get better in 2-3 days regardless, then the virus is actually no big deal. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
Also, if the 60-70 year old patients with underlying conditions who I know personally were going to get better in 2-3 days regardless, then the virus is actually no big deal. Thanks.
1. This hasn’t been seen in randomized control trials. Without randomization and control, you introduce selection bias.Originally Posted by dawg80
2. They spend money on lots of things that don’t ultimately pan out.
Covid never killed all 60-70 year olds. Most recovered without treatment. That doesn’t mean it was no big deal.
Thanks for skipping the part about underlying conditions. That was supposed to be the death nail.
Most with underlying conditions also got better. That doesn’t take away from the seriousness of it.
This is just a pandemic of the unvaccinated. If you get vaccinated you won't transmit the virus. If you get vaccinated you won't have to go to the hospital. Natural immunity is inferior to vaccine immunity.
Got it.
Exactly. Big Pharma pressured all of the regulatory bodies who in turn pressured Big Government and Big Media to suppress any reasonable and cheap alternative treatment because it would have cut directly into Big Pharma's bottom line.
The link I just posted about legal action in India goes directly to this point.
Follow the money.
Goosey is right on this point. I’m not anti-Ivermectin, but without randomized clinical trials, you have no idea whether it works or not. I’ve seen people that were really sick with Covid get better in a few days without treatment. A lot of people. If those same people would have been taking medicine x, they would have believed that it cured them when in fact, they got better on their own. Having said that, I hope it turns out to be an effective treatment, I just haven’t seen the evidence to back it up yet.
I also believe that it is in the realm of possibility that Big Pharma can manipulate trials and suppress information. They’ve done it many, many times in the past. Perdue Pharmacy and OxyContin is just one of many examples of what they are capable of when it comes to making sure the big profits keep rolling in. With the way that everything has become a political battlefield now days, who knows what’s true anymore.
Exactly why it is ludicrous for the new formulation of China virus innoculation to get rubberstamp approval from the regulatory agencies with no completed human trials whatsoever.
The regulatory agencies show that they are in the deep pockets of Big Pharma every chance they get.
JUST IN: CDC Panel Votes in Favor of Recommending New Covid Booster Shots That Have Never Been Tested on Humans (thegatewaypundit.com)
At what point does the anecdotal evidence equal or outweigh the supposedly scientific evidence? As in, how much more first hand, real life evidence do we need to know the medical community will only allow the outcome they want?
That’s when it becomes a vaccine and not merely a shot.
What happened to following CDC guidance? Rules for thee and not for me again.
Head Start school programs require COVID masks for children, contrary to CDC guidance | Just The News
New research estimates COVID vax causes at least 18 "serious adverse events" in young adults for every hospitalization prevented. NIH observational study finds "variety of neuropathic symptoms" post-vaccination.
Feds reeling from new vax study, lawsuits on social media censorship and COVID stat manipulation | Just The News
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote