CVS says they can distribute 1,000,000 vaccines/day by themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
CVS says they can distribute 1,000,000 vaccines/day by themselves.
...and you believe them? No way that rate can be done ANYWHERE in Louisiana. Think about how impossible it would be in New York or California.Originally Posted by johnnylightnin
The problem appears to be the restrictions on who can take the shot. Those in the allowed age range or care givers are not coming forth to take the shot(s).
...but I'm just basing on what I'm seeing and hearing, not what the haters are saying.
Trump set the states up for failure. Did you not read the WSJ article I posted above?
Plus, it is obvious that states didn’t have the resource to do it.
Failure of leadership by someone that was content to say the race was over at the first pit stop.
As I pointed out months ago, FDA approval wasn’t the finish line. Even Dawg80’s reply to that comment was basically “no duh”. Too bad POTUS didn’t recognize the same.
The Phizer vaccine, and I assume the others too, still doesn't have FDA approval. Says so in the handouts they gave us...kind of a disclaimer I suppose, in case something happens.
I also hear that Phizer is now saying after the 1st shot people will be 53% protected, that going up to 95% after the second shot. Johnson & Johnson's vaccine, which is DNA based rather than RNA based, will be 99% effective with just one shot. Not sure about Moderna's. I'm glad I loaded up on JNJ stock last year. I did so as they settled the latest of many lawsuits. I expected a bounce, and got one. And now, she's climbing again!
We'll see how Mr. 100M does about April 1.
Trump has "managed" more anything than Biden has ever managed. Again, Trump knew the military would have to be involved. You leftists didn't want that.
Those on the left are still hawking the masks (getting ready for federal mandate) by saying masks decrease chances of getting the china virus by 50%...many people will and do believe that BS.
That is BS...it’s north of 60% (when worn properly while observing social distancing).
Based on what? CDC?
LancetBased on what? CDC?
So "Lancet" says if everybody does what we suggest they have a greater than 60% chance of staying free of the china virus? WTH are they basing this on?
The editor slept at a Holiday Inn Express.
We’ve been over this 100 times. You either dismiss it out of hand or refuse to read to journal article. Google if you care to. I don’t care whether you believe it or not. Remember facts don’t care about your feelings.
It has nothing to do with "feelings". These are NOT facts they are speculation. It's about logic AND science. Where does the science prove this nonsense?
...if you wear a mask...
...if you wear the mask it properly...
...if you distance when wearing the mask properly...
Those last two were added by you. I assume you will continue to wear a mask up to a certain point. What is that point? Inauguration day? Vaccination(shot) day? Day 100 of the Harris/Biden admin?
Wearing a mask is a precondition for the other two, wouldn’t you agree?
You are quite entrenched in you anti-mask (and other Trumpian views). It is okay to admit you are wrong and move on. You may find it liberating.
Many people have trashed their lives, livelihoods, and relationships by their commitment to believing things that just aren’t true because they can’t accept that they were so wrong before. I don’t want that for anyone.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
