|
|
|
|
|
That is about as flimsy as it gets for “evidence”
I agree that Biden doesn't remember anything, but, the evidence is on Hunter's computer, and, both twitter and facebook have banned the New York Post article. The FBI has the computer and Rudy Giuliani's lawyer has a copy of the hard drive.
The “evidence” doesn’t even mention Joe.Originally Posted by DONW
Have you seen the e-mail?
I thought I did. Is there one that mentions Joe?
Let me clarify - one where Hunter mentions Biden.
Assuming that the email from Ukraine guy is legit (and there are various reasons to even doubt that), it was about a prospective future meeting, implying Hunter offered it obviously, but that still doesn’t connect Joe to doing anything wrong. Nothing that suggest Joe was involved with the offer for a meeting or that the meeting ever happened.
Again, the fact that Hunter was making money off of his last name isn’t really something Joe is responsible for. Joe can only be responsible for his own actions.
Twitter also banned the NYPost story and spiked it. They said it was "damaging" information and could not be shared or reposted. They stepped off in it big time. CEO Jack Dorsey working late tonight in damage control...
quote:
jack
@jack
Our communication around our actions on the @nypost
article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable.
The Ukraine energy official was thanking Hunter for getting him the meeting with Joe.
Apparently, Hunter didn’t actually get him the meeting.
??? then who setup the meeting between this guy and Biden?
Why are you lying? Twitter didn’t block it because it was “damaging”.Twitter also banned the NYPost story and spiked it. They said it was "damaging" information and could not be shared or reposted. They stepped off in it big time. CEO Jack Dorsey working late tonight in damage control...
quote:
jack
@jack
Our communication around our actions on the @nypost
article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable.
Twitter blocked the story because was found in violation of Twitter's Hacked Material Policy, which doesn't "permit the use of our services to directly distribute content obtained through hacking that contains private information, may put people in physical harm or danger, or contains trade secrets."
Dorsey wasn’t happy that they didn’t immediately provide the reasoning for blocking the content.
There was no meeting. Maybe Hunter said he could arrange one, but there is nothing that suggests Joe agreed to it.
Who said there was no meeting? Link?
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.cnb...den-story.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote